Product Platform and Product Family Design 2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-29197-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Product Platform Planning in the Front End

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with the sizable amount of research on methodologies and existing anecdotal evidence, literature has called for a better understanding of the different contexts in which platforms are applied (Halman et al, 2003). Stating that platform planning is too often "decoupled" from NPD strategy resulting in unsatisfactory designs (Bowman, 2006) and NPD strategy must be "recast" to capture the degree to which product platforms will be leveraged (Meyer and Mugge, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypotheses Platform Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the sizable amount of research on methodologies and existing anecdotal evidence, literature has called for a better understanding of the different contexts in which platforms are applied (Halman et al, 2003). Stating that platform planning is too often "decoupled" from NPD strategy resulting in unsatisfactory designs (Bowman, 2006) and NPD strategy must be "recast" to capture the degree to which product platforms will be leveraged (Meyer and Mugge, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypotheses Platform Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. are aligned to strategically defined message of the brand' (Karjalainen, 2003); between a product and its line members when a group of same brand products 'share similar features, functionality, or lineage' (Bowman, 2006) or are 'sold to the same customer groups' (Kotler and Armstrong, 2012); and between a product and its context when there is 'fit as a whole to the context outside' (Alexander, 1973). Internal coherence can be considered between a product's properties when there is 'internal fitness between the pieces it is made of' (Alexander, 1973); between the product's form and function when they are 'mutually united' (Su and Hao, 2010); and between the product's sensory information when there is 'cross-modal correspondence' or 'congruence of sensory messages' (Schifferstein and Hekkert, 2008) or when 'sensory information duplicate or complement one another' (Schifferstein and Desmet, 2008).…”
Section: Coherence In Product Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Striking a good balance between commonality (which minimises costs and supports flow) and distinctiveness (which enables uniqueness and differentiation) in products is a major challenge in platform development. To provide customisation and maximise the economy of operations, Bowman (2006) suggests that market positioning should be defined with respect to customer needs. Distinctiveness can be increased without compromising economies of scale by adopting a modular design and/or delaying the product differentiation of parts and modules in the MTO supply chain (Robertson and Ulrich, 1998).…”
Section: The Platform Concept -A Carrier For Innovation?mentioning
confidence: 99%