2014
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2013.2290035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Monitoring of Freeloading User in the Presence of Active User in Cognitive Radio Networks

Abstract: In cognitive networks, primary and secondary users (PUs and SUs) share the radio resource according to fair regulations. The goal of this paper is to introduce a new method to detect an unfair user (freeloader) that hides its radio signal under the noise floor in the presence of an active (either primary or secondary) user. The performance of the proposed technique is evaluated by theoretical analysis and computer simulations. The probability of detection is expressed, for constant false-alarm rates, as a func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To successively sense an interference signal at the controller, the interfering nodes must be S0γmeters away from it. Thus, the sensing range of controller is limited by Equation . Rc=()1+S0γ.2em×.2emdopt where S 0 denotes the capture threshold value for a correct reception.…”
Section: Estimation Of Emergency User Using Fixed Sensing Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To successively sense an interference signal at the controller, the interfering nodes must be S0γmeters away from it. Thus, the sensing range of controller is limited by Equation . Rc=()1+S0γ.2em×.2emdopt where S 0 denotes the capture threshold value for a correct reception.…”
Section: Estimation Of Emergency User Using Fixed Sensing Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To successively sense an interference signal at the controller, the interfering nodes must be ffiffiffiffi ffi S 0 γ p meters away from it. Thus, the sensing range 19 of controller is limited by Equation (12).…”
Section: Signal To Interference Ratio Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, MUs provide an incorrect look about the spectrum availability, while it is already in use by the PU which reduces overall detection probability of the system. The detection of unfair user using a novel method is proposed in [14], in which the unfair user hides its radio signal under the noise floor in the presence of an active primary user or SU for a constant false alarm rates. An innovative technique for the detection of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing-(OFDM-) based PU signal is proposed under the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional solution is based on the energy detector (ED) [8]- [9], but its performance deteriorates in presence of low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), due to strong channel noise. A solution is offered by detection techniques based on cyclostationarity features [10], higher order moments [11], or on autocorrelation functions [12]. These techniques allow distinguishing the periodicity of the autocorrelation from the channel noise, providing better performance than the ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%