The dynamics of the photoelectric effect in solid-state systems can be investigated via attosecond-time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. This article provides a comparison of delay information accessible by the two most important techniques, attosecond streaking spectroscopy and reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions (RABBITT) at solid surfaces, respectively. The analysis is based on simulated time-resolved photoemission spectra obtained by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in a single-active-electron approximation. We show a continuous transition from the few-cycle RABBITT regime to the streaking regime as two special cases of laser-assisted photoemission. The absolute delay times obtained by both methods agree with each other, within the uncertainty limits for kinetic energies >10 eV. Moreover, for kinetic energies >10 eV, both streaking delay time and RABBITT delay time coincide with the classical time of flight for an electron propagating from the emitter atom to the bulk-vacuum interface, with only small deviations of less than 4 as due to quantum mechanical interference effects. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 592 2 of 15 field [6,24,25], and intra-atomic Eisenbud-Wigner-Smith (EWS) delays [10] have also been recently investigated.The key to attosecond laser pulses is the energy upconversion of an ultrashort few-cycle near-infrared laser pulse (IR) to shorter wavelengths in the EUV regime via the high harmonic generation (HHG) process [26,27]. Typically, an attosecond EUV burst is used to excite electrons from a bound core level or valence state into the continuum. To obtain temporal resolution, photoelectrons are probed by the fundamental IR pulse. Here, the most important techniques are the reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions (RABBITT) [2,28], and attosecond streaking spectroscopy [29].The main difference between these techniques is that RABBITT uses an attosecond pulse train (APT) to excite photoelectrons, while streaking spectroscopy is based on excitation with a single-attosecond pulse (SAP). In both cases, the time delay between the EUV and IR pulse is varied to obtain an energy-and time-resolved spectrogram.The photoemission process can be envisioned as follows: The EUV pulse (train) excites a wave packet from an initial state Φ 0 (z) into a final state inside the material (Figure 1). However, because of the different time structure and corresponding EUV energy spectrum, the generated electron-wave packets exhibit different momentum or kinetic-energy distributions. In a streaking experiment, excitation with a single-attosecond pulse led to broad excitation-energy distribution in the order of several eV (Figure 1a), whereas in RABBITT the femtosecond envelope of the APT resulted in a highly modulated distribution that exhibited rather narrow spectral features (Figure 1b). Because of the HHG process, these spectral features are separated by twice the fundamental photon energy. In both cases, the so-generated con...