2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3036134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Hybrid Method for the Detection and Rejection of Electrooculogram (EOG) and Power Line Noise Artefacts From Electroencephalogram (EEG) Mixtures

Abstract: Electrooculogram (EOG) and power line noise artefact detection and rejection have commonly utilized Stone's blind source separation (Stone's BSS) algorithm. The paper suggests a hybrid method between particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Stone's BSS for the detection and rejection of electrooculogram (EOG) and power line noise in the single-channel without the use of a notch filter. The proposed method contains three major steps: centralizing and whitening of the input EEG signal, incorporating the processing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the physiological artifacts are mainly generated by the biological activity of the system’s user. For example, these artifacts are generated by the heartbeat, eye movement, muscle activation and user movement [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Fortunately, the methods to eliminate these artifacts are quite simple because they represent repeated morphology waves related to body member function that can be learned by the system during the training phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the physiological artifacts are mainly generated by the biological activity of the system’s user. For example, these artifacts are generated by the heartbeat, eye movement, muscle activation and user movement [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Fortunately, the methods to eliminate these artifacts are quite simple because they represent repeated morphology waves related to body member function that can be learned by the system during the training phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swarm intelligence-based (SI) heuristic search methods aim to investigate the behavior of a group of agents in self-organized communities, such as ants, bees, moths, and birds [1]. Recently, several SI algorithms, such as the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [28], Bee Optimization Algorithm (BeOA) [29], Moth-flame optimizer (MFO) [30], Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO) [31], Butterfly Optimization algorithm (BOA) [32], Bat Algorithm (BAT) [33], Firefly Algorithm (FFA) [1], Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) [34], Moth Optimization Algorithm (MOA) [30], Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [2] and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [2,35] have been successfully utilized to discover the optimal feature subset. However, despite the excellent findings, most of these algorithms have a poor convergence rate and are entrapped in local optima [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swarm intelligence-based (SI) heuristic search methods aim to investigate the behaviour of a group of agents in self-organized communities, such as ants, bees, moths, and birds [3]. Recently, several SI algorithms, such as the ant colony optimization (ACO) [34], bee optimization algorithm (BeOA) [35], moth-flame optimizer (MFO) [36], multi-verse optimizer (MVO) [37], butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) [38], bat algorithm (BAT) [39], firefly algorithm (FFA) [3], grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [40], moth optimization algorithm (MOA) [36], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [2], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [2,41], have been successfully utilized to discover the optimal feature subset. However, despite the excellent findings, most of these algorithms have a poor convergence rate and are entrapped in local optima [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%