2001
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography

Abstract: There is limited data currently available for making dose and risk assessments for paediatric patients undergoing computed tomographic examination. A method has been developed to correlate the risk-related quantity, effective dose, to the more simply derived quantity dose-length product. This involved scanning a series of paediatric anthropomorphic phantoms containing thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure effective dose for scans of various anatomic regions. The quantity effective dose per dose-length produc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to calculate the effective dose for this study, the E eff /DLP factors had to be used. These factors emerged from a study in North England by Chapple et al (2002). The purpose of this study was to correlate the risk-related quantity E eff to the more simply derived quantity DLP.…”
Section: Effective Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to calculate the effective dose for this study, the E eff /DLP factors had to be used. These factors emerged from a study in North England by Chapple et al (2002). The purpose of this study was to correlate the risk-related quantity E eff to the more simply derived quantity DLP.…”
Section: Effective Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But DLP and CTDI w have the important advantage of being measurable and thus offered by the scanner at the end of a study or even earlier for prospective planning. Since the literature gives factors to translate DLP values into effective dose (Table 5, [8,38]), DLP as the only practical risk parameter must be checked regularly by both the radiologist and the technician. Historically, with sequential CT, contiguous slices were usually measured, giving a more or less homogeneous dose distribution that we define as 100%.…”
Section: Optimise Scan Parameters For Volume Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a myriad of physical 3,4 and computerized [5][6][7][8][9][10] anthropomorphic phantoms exist for dosimetric applications, they only represent standard or limited patient sizes at discrete reference ages ͑e.g., 0, 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of age͒ and do not reflect the size and hence dose variation from patient to patient. Furthermore, the current protocol designs rely on dose as a surrogate for the risk of cancer incidence, neglecting the fact that the same dose delivered to two patients may entail substantially different risks due to age and gender differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%