Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3515864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient‐specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: Part II. Application to patients

Abstract: Purpose: Current methods for estimating and reporting radiation dose from CT examinations are largely patient-generic; the body size and hence dose variation from patient to patient is not reflected. Furthermore, the current protocol designs rely on dose as a surrogate for the risk of cancer incidence, neglecting the strong dependence of risk on age and gender. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for estimating patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk from CT examinations. Methods: The stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
130
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dramatic dose variation near the periphery of a scanned volume, which was caused by different tube starting angles alone, has also been reported in the literature. 22,23,43 This characteristic of the helical CT scans created a random factor into our point dose measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dramatic dose variation near the periphery of a scanned volume, which was caused by different tube starting angles alone, has also been reported in the literature. 22,23,43 This characteristic of the helical CT scans created a random factor into our point dose measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advances in both computational phantoms and modeling of CT systems, several research groups have worked on more patientspecific CT dose estimation methods. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] One such software is the VirtualDose (www.virtual-dose.com) that employs a library of adult and pediatric patient phantoms for organ dose reporting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional advantage of GI is the comparatively low coherence requirement, which allows not only the use of synchrotron sources but, utilizing a third grating, also of standard laboratory X-ray tubes (Pfeiffer et al, 2006). This makes GI of special interest for medical applications and in recent years a lot of effort has been put into making this technique available for clinical applications (Stampanoni et al, 2011;Tang et al, 2012;Li et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional work has been done to normalize for inherent differences in scanner geometries and enable comparisons of dose estimates between scanners; however, these corrections still do not account for patient factors such as size, gender, and body habitus [7,8]. Recent work using Monte Carlo simulations to calculate organ doses from anthropomorphic phantoms of different sizes has more clearly illustrated how much DLP can vary with patient size [9,10]. At present, these Monte Carlo-based methods are computationally intensive, rendering it impractical to model every patient individually and necessitating the need for standardized phantoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%