2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ZnCl2 on plaque growth and biofilm vitality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, RSM was used to optimize the amount of four diff erent antimicrobial agents which could inhibit the growth of biofi lm based on preliminary steps (single factor test and orthogonal test) and optimum antimicrobial agents (2.16 g/L of ZnSO 4 , 14 g/L of lysozyme, 4.5 g/L of citric acid and 5 g/L of chitosan), from which the desired inhibition ratio of biofi lm was obtained. This is in accordance with Gu et al (2012), who reported that mouthrinse with zinc at a concentration of 2.5 mmol/L or 5.0 mmol/L has signifi cant antibacterial and plaque control eff ects on the outer and middle layers of the biofi lm in vivo. From the results of the orthogonal test and RSM, it is worthwhile to mention that the infl uence of ZnSO 4 when compared with the other factors was not so signifi cant on the inhibition ratio of biofi lm with increasing concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, RSM was used to optimize the amount of four diff erent antimicrobial agents which could inhibit the growth of biofi lm based on preliminary steps (single factor test and orthogonal test) and optimum antimicrobial agents (2.16 g/L of ZnSO 4 , 14 g/L of lysozyme, 4.5 g/L of citric acid and 5 g/L of chitosan), from which the desired inhibition ratio of biofi lm was obtained. This is in accordance with Gu et al (2012), who reported that mouthrinse with zinc at a concentration of 2.5 mmol/L or 5.0 mmol/L has signifi cant antibacterial and plaque control eff ects on the outer and middle layers of the biofi lm in vivo. From the results of the orthogonal test and RSM, it is worthwhile to mention that the infl uence of ZnSO 4 when compared with the other factors was not so signifi cant on the inhibition ratio of biofi lm with increasing concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As shown in Fig.1b, when the lysozyme independently infl uenced the biofi lm, the inhibition ratio of biofi lm was very low. This phenomenon may be because a zinc ion can activate a particular part of lysozyme which can more eff ectively increase the inhibition ratio of lysozyme (He et al, 2002;Burguera-Pascu et al, 2007), but no signifi cant inhibition of vitality was observed at high concentrations, which is in accordance with the report by Gu et al (2012). Because of this reason, ZnSO 4 continued to be used in the following experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In Paper I, II and IV the active ingredients in the mouth rinse used were zinc acetate and chlorhexidine diacetate. Zinc and chlorhexidine have been reported to have antibacterial effects (Roldan et al 2004, Cousido et al 2010, Gu et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouth rinses containing metal salts, essential oils, chlorhexidine, chlorine dioxide and cetylpyridinium chloride in different combinations have been shown to reduce VSCs in exhaled air (Pitts et al 1983, Kozlovsky et al 1996, Frascella et al 2000, Silwood et al 2001, Young et al 2001, Borden et al 2002, Peruzzo et al 2007). Metal salts, essential oils, chlorhexidine, chlorine dioxide and cetylpyridinium chloride are also known to have an antibacterial effects (Young et al 2001& 2003, Roldan et al 2003& 2004, Sreenivasan et al 2005, Gu et al 2012. Data have shown that zinc (Dadamio et al 2013b), clorindioxid (Silwod et al 2001) and CHX (Quirynen et al 2005) reduces VSC levels in exhaled air.…”
Section: Mouth Rinsingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several nanoparticles (eg, zinc oxide, 60,61 silver, [62][63][64] and polyethylenimine 65 ) have been incorporated into dental composites 66 or dental adhesives 67 to inhibit the bacterial growth through several mechanisms. These mechanisms include disruption of the bacterial cell membrane, 68 inhibition of the active transport as well as the metabolism of sugars, generation of reactive oxygen species, 69 displacement of magnesium ions required for the enzymatic activity of oral biofilms, 70 disturbance of the electron transportation across the bacterial membrane, 63 and prevention of DNA replication.…”
Section: Antibacterial Nanotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%