2020
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202000242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Work‐Hardening Mechanisms in Asymmetrically Cyclic‐Loaded Austenitic Stainless Steels on Low‐Cycle and High‐Cycle Fatigue Behavior

Abstract: Dislocation characteristics and deformation‐induced martensite (DIM) transformation in an asymmetrically cyclic‐loaded metastable type 304 stainless steel (SS) are investigated compared with a stable type 316SS using EBSD and X‐ray diffraction line‐profile analysis. In low‐cycle fatigue (LCF) regime, differences between dislocation densities of type 304SS and type 316SS are increased with decreasing fatigue life, and contribution of α′‐martensite to work hardening of cyclically loaded type 304SS increased with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to samples 1 and 2, sample 3 exhibited a superior maximum tensile work hardening, which is in agreement with the result that the deformation-induced martensite transformation remarkably increased work hardening. This characteristic has been frequently reported in the relative literature on work-hardening behavior [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Compared to samples 1 and 2, sample 3 exhibited a superior maximum tensile work hardening, which is in agreement with the result that the deformation-induced martensite transformation remarkably increased work hardening. This characteristic has been frequently reported in the relative literature on work-hardening behavior [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This conclusion was confirmed in the present paper. The properties of the Ti20Nb5Zr foam (approximately 60% porosity) were as follows: compression strength 15.5 ± 0.9 MPa, elastic moduli 0.71 ± 0.1 GPa, 98 ± 5 GPa measured by compression tests and using a nanoindentation tester, respectively, HV hardness 276 ± 20, calculated yield strength 92 MPa (σ = HV/3) [ 43 , 44 ]. Figure 5 shows the stress-strain curve recorded for the Ti20Nb5Zr foam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SFE of austenite matrix is the decisive factor, and a high SFE is not conducive to the occurrence of mechanical twins. Equation (1) is used to calculate the SFE of austenitic stainless steels [22]; however, the SFE of high Mn austenitic steels is usually calculated based on thermodynamic theory, and there is no similar general calculation formula for high Mn austenitic steels at present. SFE(mJm −2 ) = −7.1 + 2.8(%Ni) + 0.49(%Cr) + 2.0(%Mo) − 2.0(%Si) + 0.75(%Mn) − 5.7(%C)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%