Effect of weightlifting training on jumping ability, sprinting performance and squat strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

García-Valverde, Adrián; Manresa‐Rocamora, Agustín; Hernández-Davó, José Luis; Solana, Rafael Sabido

doi:10.1177/17479541211061695

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…isometric strength or CK), these findings have important implications for the use of compression throughout unaccustomed training. The utility of strength training for improving high‐velocity performance is well established (Cronin et al., 2007 ; García‐Valverde et al., 2022 ), with greater isokinetic strength commonly associated with improved power performance in active and athletic populations (Janicijevic et al., 2020 ; Moreira et al., 2021 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite initial efforts at pair-matching, follow-up questioning on adherence revealed that one participant mistakenly took the wrong allocation, resulting in n = 18 and n = 16 for CG and PLA, respectively. Accordingly, a betweengroup design was employed, using a linear mixed effects model with random intercepts for each participant to account for individual variation in EIMD(Gandotra et al, 2021). The consideration of random effects in a statistical model also allows for participants to be included up until the point of withdrawal to enhance statistical power and reduce sample bias(Nich & Carroll, 2002).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of medical grade compression garments on the repeated‐bout effect in non‐resistance‐trained men

Brown,

Hill,

Renshaw

et al. 2023

Experimental Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New Findings What is the central question of this study? What are the effects of compression garments on recovery from unaccustomed damaging exercise and subsequent protective adaptations? What is the main finding and its importance? Compression did not influence recovery, but was associated with blunted protective adaptations for isokinetic performance, which were completely absent at high velocities. Based on these findings, the use of compression garments for recovery would not be recommended following unaccustomed exercise, particularly if the maintenance of high‐velocity performance following exercise‐induced muscle damage is desirable. AbstractWhilst compression garments (CG) may enhance recovery from exercise‐induced muscle damage (EIMD), many recovery strategies can attenuate adaptative responses. Therefore, the effects of CG on recovery from EIMD, and the rapid protective adaptations known as the repeated bout effect (RBE) were investigated. Thirty‐four non‐resistance‐trained males (18–45 years) randomly received class II medical‐grade CG or placebo for 72 h following eccentrically‐focused lower‐body exercise, in a double‐blind, randomised controlled trial. Indices of EIMD were assessed at baseline, 0, 24, 48 and 72 h post‐exercise, before exercise and testing were repeated after 14 days. Results were analysed using a three‐way (time × condition × bout) linear mixed‐effects model. Exercise impaired isometric and isokinetic strength, with soreness and thigh circumference elevated for 72 h (P < 0.001). Compression did not enhance recovery (P > 0.05), despite small to moderate effect sizes (ES, reported alongside 90% confidence intervals) for isokinetic strength (ES from 0.2 [−0.41, 0.82] to 0.65 [0.03, 1.28]). All variables recovered faster after the repeated bout (P < 0.005). However, RBE for peak isokinetic force was impaired in CG at 60° s−1 (group × bout interaction: χ2 = 4.24, P = 0.0395; ES = −0.56 [−1.18, 0.07]) and completely absent at 120° s−1 (χ2 = 16.2, P < 0.001, ES = −0.96 [−1.61, −0.32]) and 180° s−1 (χ2 = 10.4, P = 0.001, ES = −0.72 [−1.35, −0.09]). Compression blunted RBE at higher isokinetic velocities without improving recovery in non‐resistance‐trained males, potentially contraindicating their use following unaccustomed exercise in this population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of medical grade compression garments on the repeated‐bout effect in non‐resistance‐trained men

Brown,

Hill,

Renshaw

et al. 2023

Experimental Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…OW exercises are often part of multimodal training regimens; thus, isolating the actual effect of OW exercises is challenging. Although Garcia-Valverde et al [13] showed that multimodal training regimens that included weightlifting exercises produced greater within-group improvement in sprint performance, they did not compare the effect of weightlifting exercises between participants randomized to receive different interventions. Morris et al [14] showed that different training regimens could impact sprint performance differently.…”

Section: Sprint Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These factors can moderate the effect of weightlifting interventions on sprint performance. Weightlifting interventions that target beginners, have a training frequency of two times per week or less, and a duration of at least 12 weeks offers the greatest benefit in improving sprint performance [13]. Therefore, future studies should evaluate if there is an optimal dose of OW training (content, frequency, and duration) to maximize the beneficial effect of OW training on sprint performance.…”

Section: Primary Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Olympic Weightlifting Training for Sprint Performance in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Crenshaw,

Zeppieri,

Hung

et al. 2023

Int J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Olympic weightlifting exercises would improve sprint performance when compared to a control intervention, (no training, sports-specific training, traditional resistance training, or plyometric training). Medline, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Biological Science from inception to September 2022 was searched. Two authors independently selected, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias in included studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The primary meta-analysis combined the results of the sprint performance over the full length of each sprint test. The secondary meta-analyses combined the results of the sprint performance at 5, 10, and 20m distance to capture information about acceleration phase of the sprint tests. Eight studies with 206 athletes (female n = 10, age range: 18.9–24.2 years) were identified. Sprint performance did not differ significantly comparing Olympic Weightlifting to control intervention, nor the full length (standardized mean difference = -0.07, 95% CI = -0.47 to 0.34, p = 0.75, I2 = 46%) or during the acceleration phase (p ≥ 0.26) of the sprint test. Olympic Weightlifting training does not improve sprint performance to a greater extent than comparator interventions.

show abstract

“…Researchers have concluded that weightlifting movements and their derivatives may provide greater strength, power, and speed adaptations compared to other methods of training [ 1 ], especially when added to traditional resistance training programs [ 2 ]. A growing body of research has shown that training with weightlifting pulling derivatives (i.e., clean or snatch variations that exclude the catch phase) [ 3 ] may improve dynamic and isometric strength, jump performance, sprint speed, and change of direction performance [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability, Validity, and Comparison of Barbell Velocity Measurement Devices during the Jump Shrug and Hang High Pull

Suchomel

Techmanski²,

Kissick³

et al. 2023

JFMK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the reliability, potential bias, and practical differences between the GymAware Powertool (GA), Tendo Power Analyzer (TENDO), and Push Band 2.0 (PUSH) during the jump shrug (JS) and hang high pull (HHP) performed across a spectrum of loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men performed JS and HHP repetitions with 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of their 1RM hang power clean, and mean (MBV) and peak barbell velocity (PBV) were determined by each velocity measurement device. Least-products regression and Bland–Altman plots were used to examine instances of proportional, fixed, and systematic bias between the TENDO and PUSH compared to the GA. Hedge’s g effect sizes were also calculated to determine any meaningful differences between devices. The GA and TENDO displayed excellent reliability and acceptable variability during the JS and HHP while the PUSH showed instances of poor–moderate reliability and unacceptable variability at various loads. While the TENDO and PUSH showed instances of various bias, the TENDO device demonstrated greater validity when compared to the GA. Trivial–small differences were shown between the GA and TENDO during the JS and HHP exercises while trivial–moderate differences existed between GA and PUSH during the JS. However, despite trivial–small effects between the GA and PUSH devices at 20 and 40% 1RM during the HHP, practically meaningful differences existed at 60, 80, and 100%, indicating that the PUSH velocity outputs were not accurate. The TENDO appears to be more reliable and valid than the PUSH when measuring MBV and PBV during the JS and HHP.

show abstract

Effect of weightlifting training on jumping ability, sprinting performance and squat strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 5 publications

References 74 publications

The effect of medical grade compression garments on the repeated‐bout effect in non‐resistance‐trained men

The effect of medical grade compression garments on the repeated‐bout effect in non‐resistance‐trained men

Olympic Weightlifting Training for Sprint Performance in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Reliability, Validity, and Comparison of Barbell Velocity Measurement Devices during the Jump Shrug and Hang High Pull

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About