1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1987.tb02143.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Water‐Level Recoveries on Fault Creep, Houston, Texas

Abstract: Fault creep has stopped or slowed in the eastern part of the Houston, Texas, land subsidence area where reductions in pumping of ground water have allowed water levels to recover partially. Creep has continued across faults in the western part where heavy pumping causes water levels to continue to decline. The observations support the long‐suspected relation between historical faulting and withdrawal of ground water and indicate that partial water‐level recoveries can reduce fault movement and structural damag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the cause of this short-term motion, no record of seismic activity exists in this region at a magnitude that registered on Rice University's EQ-1 instruments approximately 135 km away (Rice University, 2012). Still, one would not necessarily expect seismicity from growth fault motion as the literature generally speculates aseismic creep as the dominant form of movement (Holzer and Gabrysch, 1987;Verbeek et al, 2005), though exceptions may have occurred (Pratt and Johnson, 1926;Segal, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Whatever the cause of this short-term motion, no record of seismic activity exists in this region at a magnitude that registered on Rice University's EQ-1 instruments approximately 135 km away (Rice University, 2012). Still, one would not necessarily expect seismicity from growth fault motion as the literature generally speculates aseismic creep as the dominant form of movement (Holzer and Gabrysch, 1987;Verbeek et al, 2005), though exceptions may have occurred (Pratt and Johnson, 1926;Segal, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous explanations for the causes of modern faulting along the Gulf Coast have emphasized groundwater and petroleum extraction [ Holzer and Gabrysch , 1987; Morton et al , 2002]. Although applicable in some areas such as Houston‐Galveston, the groundwater extraction explanation is untenable for southeast Louisiana (and SLA) because groundwater withdrawal is minimal, due to severe saltwater intrusion [ Kazmann and Heath , 1968; Baumann et al , 2006].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, modern subsidence in the gulf region is usually described as a near‐surface effect, the consequence of shallow sedimentary processes and/or human activities [ Boesch et al , 1994; Gagliano , 1999; Reed and Wilson , 2004]. In particular, faulting and related subsidence is generally attributed to groundwater extraction [ Holzer and Gabrysch , 1987] or oil and gas production [ Morton et al , 2002]. Here, we present new GPS data that reveal both vertical (subsidence) and horizontal (southward translation) motions of New Orleans and the larger Mississippi delta and propose that these motions reflect southward translation of a crustal‐scale allochthon encompassing southeastern Louisiana and offshore regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only recently that faulting has been proposed as a significant cause of subsidence (e.g., Gagliano, 1999). Some, however, consider faulting to be human induced and related to groundwater withdrawal (e.g., Holzer and Gabrysch, 1987) or to oil and gas production (e.g., Morton et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introduction and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%