1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1270-9638(97)90000-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of wall suction on leading edge contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, transition is regularly observed in experiments above the significantly lower value Re tr ≈ 250 (Gaster 1967;Poll 1979;Arnal et al 1997), if the flow is subject to sufficiently large disturbances, as confirmed in the simulations by Spalart (1988) and Dimas, Mowli & Piomelli (2003). Experiments by Gaster (1967) and Pfenninger (1977) led to the hypothesis of leading-edge contamination, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, transition is regularly observed in experiments above the significantly lower value Re tr ≈ 250 (Gaster 1967;Poll 1979;Arnal et al 1997), if the flow is subject to sufficiently large disturbances, as confirmed in the simulations by Spalart (1988) and Dimas, Mowli & Piomelli (2003). Experiments by Gaster (1967) and Pfenninger (1977) led to the hypothesis of leading-edge contamination, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…To this end we analyse the transition Reynolds number Re tr at which turbulent flow can first be observed and its dependence on the wall suction strength κ. It is known that wall suction (κ > 0) stabilizes the attachment-line flow both by extending the region of primary linear stability (Hall et al 1984;Joslin 1995) and by inhibiting the transition to turbulence (Spalart 1988;Arnal et al 1997).…”
Section: Comparison Of Dns Results To Experiments and Simulations Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These wedge-shapes regions can also form downstream of the impact location, where a small delay in the transition of the boundary layer occurs. For a swept wing, it is particularly important to avoid disturbances near the attachment line as this could adversely affect laminar flow over the entire outboard region of the surface and consequent increase in drag [23,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Critical Height To Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subcritical instability, which may cause turbulence immediately downstream of the leading edge, occurs independently of the classical Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) and cross-flow bypass transition scenarios (Owen & Randall 1952;Saric et al 2003). Understanding the transition processes of this boundary layer at the leading-edge of a swept wing is a crucial step towards delaying or inhibiting the onset of turbulence along the wing, and thus towards a reduction of airplane drag and fuel consumption (Arnal et al 1997). As yet, these processes are not fully understood and attempts to explain the transition comprise elaborate linear biglobal stability analyses (Theofilis et al 2003;Robitaillié-Montané 2005) and numerical simulations of secondary instability phenomena (Obrist, Henniger & Kleiser 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%