“…To establish whether a causal relationship exists between hypoxia per se and cold injury, a number of studies (Daanen and van Ruiten, 2000;Mathew et al, 1977;1979;Purkayastha et al, 1999;Takeoka et al, 1993) examining the vasomotor responses of the extremities during local cold stress in controlled laboratory conditions at high altitude have suggested that systemic arterial hypoxia exaggerates the cold-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction and impairs any cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) response. However, in the above studies (Daanen and van Ruiten, 2000;Mathew et al, 1977;1979;Takeoka et al, 1993;Purkayastha et al, 1999), the temperature of the digits prior to the local cold provocation was significantly lower in the hypoxic than in the normoxic cold test, despite the similar general thermal status of the subjects; this effect appears not to have been taken into account when concluding that hypoxia potentiates the cold-induced vasoconstrictor response. In view of the fact that the cold tests were performed a few hours (Daanen and van Ruiten, 2000;Mathew et al, 1977) or days (Daanen and van Ruiten, 2000;Mathew et al, 1977;1979;Takeoka et al, 1993;Purkayastha et al, 1999) after the arrival of the subjects at high altitude, the enhanced peripheral vasoconstrictor tone was probably attributable either to the distinct effects of hypoxia (Heistad and Wheeler, 1970;Kollai, 1983), or to the synergistic actions of hypoxia and low ambient temperature (Cipriano and Goldman, 1975).…”