2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vibration magnitude, vibration spectrum and muscle tension on apparent mass and cross axis transfer functions during whole-body vibration exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, changes in transmissibility reported in this study may not strictly be due to changes in frequency, since vibration exposure magnitude also increased when exposure frequency increased. Furthermore, several researchers have reported transmissibility increases with increasing magnitude [9,36,37]. Second, although participants' foot placement was controlled and all were given the same instruction with regard to how to stand, it could not be confirmed that all participants' maintained the same posture throughout the 45-second FTV exposure period.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, changes in transmissibility reported in this study may not strictly be due to changes in frequency, since vibration exposure magnitude also increased when exposure frequency increased. Furthermore, several researchers have reported transmissibility increases with increasing magnitude [9,36,37]. Second, although participants' foot placement was controlled and all were given the same instruction with regard to how to stand, it could not be confirmed that all participants' maintained the same posture throughout the 45-second FTV exposure period.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Second, although participants' foot placement was controlled and all were given the same instruction with regard to how to stand, it could not be confirmed that all participants' maintained the same posture throughout the 45-second FTV exposure period. Deviations in posture can influence vibration transmissibility due to changes in the surface contact area with the vibrating surface, which can influence the position of the bony structures and the degree of tension in different muscle groups of the trunk and the extremities, in turn changing the resonant frequency of the body structure [1,19,21,25,36,[38][39][40][41]. Thus, variations in the ankle and knee angles could have influenced the transmission of vibration from the platform through the feet and into the lower limbs.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee flexion increases the tension on the posterior muscles of the lower limbs, with a positive impact on the action of the plantar flexor muscles, in this case the triceps surae, which results in greater attenuation of vibration 25 . Greater activation of these muscles as a result of knee and hip flexion seems to permit a more intensified participation in the attenuation of vibrations, which continue to propagate after induction of the triceps surae, reducing the vibratory range and resulting in lower accelerations to the trunk and head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the WBV protocol used here was based on protocols described in the literature 12,20,24,25 . Thus, the data were recorded at vibration frequencies of 20, 35, 50 and 70 Hz and displacement amplitudes of 2.0 and 6.0 mm.…”
Section: Whole-body Vibration Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other postural and environmental factors have also been found to affect the vertical apparent mass at the seat surface, including seat pan inclination 9,24) , the frequency of vibration 25) , and the thickness of backrest foam 11) . Although the influence of these factors on apparent mass may sometimes be small relative to the influence of other factors investigated here, systematic investigations are appropriate to better understand the influence of all factors influencing apparent mass and its practical applications.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%