2016
DOI: 10.3233/oer-160236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the biodynamic response of the foot to vibration exposure

Abstract: Abstract.BACKGROUND: Exposure to foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) has been linked to injury; however, the biodynamic response of the foot to FTV has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure vibration transmissibility from the floor-to-ankle, and the floor-to-metatarsal, during exposure to FTV while standing, and to determine if FTV exposure frequency, or participant mass or arch index (AI) influence the transmission of FTV through the foot. METHODS: Participants' AI was measured. Four ADXL3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result confirms that a different shoes compliance does not modify the apparent mass measured at the driving point [25]. Goggins and colleagues [26] also observed a difference in vibration transmissibility over a 25-50 Hz exposure frequency with the greatest magnitude of transmissibility occurring at 25-30 Hz for the ankle and 50 Hz for the first toe.…”
Section: Ftv Associated With the Midsole/insole Materialssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result confirms that a different shoes compliance does not modify the apparent mass measured at the driving point [25]. Goggins and colleagues [26] also observed a difference in vibration transmissibility over a 25-50 Hz exposure frequency with the greatest magnitude of transmissibility occurring at 25-30 Hz for the ankle and 50 Hz for the first toe.…”
Section: Ftv Associated With the Midsole/insole Materialssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although the participants were asked to maintain this posture for the full 51 s of the vibration exposure, we did not strictly monitor their posture, so it is possible that minor changes in posture occurred. Changes in knee angle or standing center of pressure distribution could influence the magnitude of vibration transmitted through the body [26,31]. However, participants were observed during vibration exposure and no visual deviations from their natural upright standing posture were observed.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%