Effect of Veterans Administration Use on Indicators of Diabetes Care in a National Sample of Veterans

Abstract

Background: Diabetes poses a serious health burden, of which veterans have a disproportionate share. Few data exist regarding differences in self-care behaviors and provider-based quality of care indicators among a large sample of veterans. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Veterans Affairs (VA) use on diabetes quality of care indicators among veterans. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was done on data from 36,525 veterans in the 2003 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. VA use was defined as receiving some or all health care from a VA facility in the previous 12 months. Diabetes quality indicators such as two or more provider visits, two or more hemoglobin A1c tests, and flu and pneumonia shots were compared between VA users and non-VA users. The independent effect of VA use on each quality indicator was analyzed with multiple regression using STATA version 10 (Stata Press, College Station, TX) to account for the complex survey design and yield population estimates. Results: Among veterans with diabetes, 26.8% were VA users. The only significant difference between VA users and non-VA users was that VA users were significantly more likely to check their feet one or more times daily (75.7% vs. 68.5%, P ¼ 0.015). In final adjusted models, VA users were at least twice as likely as non-VA users to have foot exams by a provider (odds ratio 2.59) and receive flu and pneumonia shots (odds ratio 2.30 and 2.05, respectively). VA users were also more likely to have two or more provider visits, dilated eye exams, and two or more hemoglobin A1c tests than non-VA users. Conclusions: Key quality indicators for diabetes care were better among veterans getting some or all of their care from VA facilities, suggesting more effective care strategies. However, interventions should identify and perpetuate excellent self-care behaviors to more substantially impact adverse diabetes-related outcomes.

Low Rates of Retesting for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection After Treatment in the Veterans Health Administration

“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the VHA is often better than non-VHA settings at achieving highquality care, across disciplines and settings. [33][34][35][36][37] H pylori retesting has not been explicitly compared in VHA and non-VHA systems, but should not vary significantly from other quality care metrics. Still, future studies should validate our findings in other large, non-VHA settings.…”

A Randomized Comparison of Online- and Telephone-Based Care Management with Internet Training Alone in Adult Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

“…In addition, diabetes care in the VA system has improved substantially over time, attributed to increased use and dissemination of performance measures, clinical reminders, and data tracking. [28][29][30] The study was conducted during a period of system-wide declines in A1c. These possibilities would bias the study in favor of similar improvement across groups and in favor of the null hypothesis of no differences between groups.…”

Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review

“…51 Receipt of diabetes education and annual HbA1c tests was higher among VA patients compared with veterans in non-VA care. 52 VA patients were more likely than veterans receiving care outside VA to receive recommended diabetes care, including being twice as likely to have a foot examination and 60-70 % more likely to have an eye examination, two or more A1c tests, and two or more providers visits, 53 a routine checkup within 2 years (91.6 % among VA patients compared to 80.6 % overall; P < 0.001), 54 and influenza and pneumonia vaccinations (rates increased 10-240 %), 53,55,56 but similar rates of cholesterol screening. 55 Blood pressure control was higher among male African-American VA patients than male African-American non-VA patients (49.4 % vs. 44.0 %, P < 0.01) though similar among Caucasians.…”