“…Underscoring this point, we note that change in end-expiratory lung impedance (and thus end-expiratory lung volume) was widely variable, suggesting either a limitation of technique or that the relationship between flow and end-expiratory lung volume may be more complicated then assumed. The latter possibility appears to be supported by the analysis of the P aO 2 /F IO 2 data from Vargas et al 10 Applying the estimate (10 L/min flow ϭ 1.2 cm H 2 O) of Parke et al 11 to the subjects in Vargas' study with flow fixed at 60 L/min in all subjects, one would expect an airway pressure of between 5 and 7 cm H 2 O. If this were to correlate with PEEP at the alveolus, as has been implied in previous studies, it would not be unreasonable, using a conservative interpretation of such estimates, to expect a comparable improvement in oxygenation in both the 60 L/min HFNC group and the NIV group receiving 5 cm H 2 O CPAP.…”