The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of uniform blowing/suction in a turbulent boundary layer at moderate Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
62
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
18
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying the present decomposition (2.8) to drag reduction could suggest new strategies of flow control, in the same way as the FIK decomposition (1.7) has enabled significant achievements in this field (see e.g. Iwamoto et al (2005) in high-Reynolds-number channel flows, Kametani & Fukagata (2011), Kametani et al (2015 and Stroh et al (2015) in spatially-developing boundary layers, as well as Bannier et al (2015) with their extended FIK identity). Alternatively to the FIK strategy which focuses on the Reynolds shear-stress intensity, the present decomposition suggests that a flow control focusing on the turbulent kinetic-energy production level might be of interest.…”
Section: On the Relation Between The Generation Of The Turbulence-indmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applying the present decomposition (2.8) to drag reduction could suggest new strategies of flow control, in the same way as the FIK decomposition (1.7) has enabled significant achievements in this field (see e.g. Iwamoto et al (2005) in high-Reynolds-number channel flows, Kametani & Fukagata (2011), Kametani et al (2015 and Stroh et al (2015) in spatially-developing boundary layers, as well as Bannier et al (2015) with their extended FIK identity). Alternatively to the FIK strategy which focuses on the Reynolds shear-stress intensity, the present decomposition suggests that a flow control focusing on the turbulent kinetic-energy production level might be of interest.…”
Section: On the Relation Between The Generation Of The Turbulence-indmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This decomposition has been extensively and successfully used in turbulent flow analysis and control, see e.g. Iwamoto et al (2005), Kametani & Fukagata (2011), Kametani et al (2015) and Stroh et al (2015), with C f ,II typically representing the effect of the turbulent fluctuations on C f whereas C f ,I has a Reynolds-number dependence similar to laminar friction. However, several issues arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although suction is known to lead to turbulent drag enhancement (Kametani et al 2015), it is a way to delay transition to higher Re. Indeed, homogeneous suction reduces the growth rate of the Tollmien-Schlichting waves (Reynolds & Saric 1986;Schlichting 1987), increasing the linear stability threshold in Re (Hocking 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the boundary layer is thickened by the control action. This is expected since the current controller imparts a positive net mass flow rate and it is known that uniform blowing increases the boundary layer thickness (Kametani & Fukagata 2011;Kametani et al 2015;Stroh et al 2016). Note that δ starts to increase before the control slot is reached, and this is due to the upstream effect of the pressure gradient induced by the actuation, as will be discussed below.…”
Section: Mean Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They applied the FIK identity (Fukagata et al 2002) to investigate the drag reduction mechanism and concluded that the mean convection has a strong contribution in reducing the drag for UB and increasing the drag for US. More recently, Kametani et al (2015) applied UB and US in a turbulent boundary layer at moderate Reynolds number using large eddy simulations (LES). The actuation velocity had a magnitude of 0.1%U ∞ and achieved more than 10% drag reduction (or enhancement) by UB (or US).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%