2020
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis has a limited accuracy to detect positive lymph nodes but does dictate neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate preoperative lymph node understaging and its effects on postoperative local recurrence rate. Methods: Patients were selected from a retrospective cross-sectional snapshot study. Patients with emergency surgery, cM1 disease, or unknown cN-or (y)pN category were excluded. Clinical and pathologic N-categor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most patients with an intermediate-risk tumor (cT1-3N1 MRF − ) still received n(C)RT in 2016; therefore, the association of omission of n(C)RT in this patient group could less reliably be analyzed. There is still controversy whether patients with a cT1-3N1 MRF − rectal tumor should receive n(C)RT if there is no intention for organ preservation in the higher tumors, especially since the clinical suspicion of nodal involvement based on imaging remains inaccurate and has limited prognostic relevance . The MERCURY study showed that the assessment of the CRM via magnetic resonance imaging by trained radiologists is superior to the TNM-based criteria in predicting LR, DFS, and OS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most patients with an intermediate-risk tumor (cT1-3N1 MRF − ) still received n(C)RT in 2016; therefore, the association of omission of n(C)RT in this patient group could less reliably be analyzed. There is still controversy whether patients with a cT1-3N1 MRF − rectal tumor should receive n(C)RT if there is no intention for organ preservation in the higher tumors, especially since the clinical suspicion of nodal involvement based on imaging remains inaccurate and has limited prognostic relevance . The MERCURY study showed that the assessment of the CRM via magnetic resonance imaging by trained radiologists is superior to the TNM-based criteria in predicting LR, DFS, and OS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involved surgical margin and mucinous histology are additional risk factors for a local recurrence [12]. After adoption of the TME technique, the effect of mesenteric nodal involvement on local recurrence risk is less clear [13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%