1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8817(87)90016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultraviolet radiation on the Bacillus subtilis phages SPO2, SPP1 and φ29 and their DNAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inactivation curve for PCV-2 demonstrated that UV-C radiation inactivated this virus; however, even at the highest dose (9000 J/L), residual levels of PCV-2 were recovered. The presence of a resistant viral subpopulation has been attributed to the ability of some viruses to take advantage of host cell repair mechanisms [52], or in some cases they can code for their own repair machinery [53]. It has also been argued that viral particle clumping, particularly with other cells or debris, may shield some virus from UV-C radiation [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inactivation curve for PCV-2 demonstrated that UV-C radiation inactivated this virus; however, even at the highest dose (9000 J/L), residual levels of PCV-2 were recovered. The presence of a resistant viral subpopulation has been attributed to the ability of some viruses to take advantage of host cell repair mechanisms [52], or in some cases they can code for their own repair machinery [53]. It has also been argued that viral particle clumping, particularly with other cells or debris, may shield some virus from UV-C radiation [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies in results also demonstrate the complexities associated with studies to evaluate UVC inactivation of viruses, as the outcome of such experiments is dependent on the cell systems used to assay UVC-damaged viruses. For example, some viruses may experience UVC-induced DNA damage but appear UVCresistant because they code for their own repair enzymes [22] or take advantage of host cell repair mechanisms [23]. As PCR is less prone to the variations associated with cell-based assays, and PCR assay conditions are relatively easy to define and control, PCR may be a more reliable method for using to analyse and compare the UVC results from different laboratories.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%