2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10569-013-9523-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of topographic bias on geoid and reference ellipsoid of Venus, Mars, and the Moon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical values of the first five parameters are listed in Table 1. The semi-major and semi-minor axes a 0 and b 0 define the best-fitting oblate spheroids (Ardalan and Karimi, 2014;Preusker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Gravitational Field Of a Homogeneous Spheroidal Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical values of the first five parameters are listed in Table 1. The semi-major and semi-minor axes a 0 and b 0 define the best-fitting oblate spheroids (Ardalan and Karimi, 2014;Preusker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Gravitational Field Of a Homogeneous Spheroidal Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout these numerical experiments, the normal gravitational field of the Moon was generated by an equipotential spheroid. It is defined by four parameters: the major semi-axis a = 1737325.0 m, the minor semi-axis b = 1736789.0 m, the planetocentric gravitational constant GM = 4902.8×10 9 m 3 s −2 , and the angular velocity ω = 2.6617×10 −6 rad s −1 as determined by Ardalan and Karimi (2014).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%