1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199602)30:2<145::aid-jbm3>3.3.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implant surface can influence biological osteoconduction, bone formation and remodeling. Many studies have shown that during the sequence of these events, implant surface roughness has the best effect on cellular activity (Brunette 1988; Bowers et al 1992; Könönen et al 1992; Cochran et al 1994; Martin et al 1995; Schwartz et al 1996; Cooper et al 1999). Thus, implant roughness is important when immediate loading is to be applied (Salama et al 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implant surface can influence biological osteoconduction, bone formation and remodeling. Many studies have shown that during the sequence of these events, implant surface roughness has the best effect on cellular activity (Brunette 1988; Bowers et al 1992; Könönen et al 1992; Cochran et al 1994; Martin et al 1995; Schwartz et al 1996; Cooper et al 1999). Thus, implant roughness is important when immediate loading is to be applied (Salama et al 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NHOst cells responded to surface roughness with a decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity, as do fetal rat calvaria cells13 and rat costochondral cartilage cells27 cultured on the same surfaces. In contrast, alkaline phosphatase is upregulated in chick embryo osteoblasts28 and is unaffected in mouse MLO‐Y4 osteocyte‐like cells13 by changes in surface roughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical and physical properties of scaffolds affect cellular behaviour, which ultimately determines the performance and fate of tissue‐engineered cartilage constructs (Boyan et al , 1996; Freed et al , 1993; Hutmacher, 2000). It has been demonstrated that cells on substrates with controlled topography exhibit different behaviour, suggesting that cells can distinguish the geometry of their surroundings (Boyan et al , 1996; Schwartz et al , 1996). Miot et al (2005) demonstrated that composition and architecture are instructive for expanded human nasal chondrocytes in the generation of three‐dimensional (3D) cartilaginous tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%