Effect of thermocycling on the durability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin

Sangwichit, Ketkamon; Ruksaphon, Kingkaew; Pongprueksa, Pong; Senawongse, Pisol

doi:10.4012/dmj.2015-253

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Their application is user-friendly and less technique-sensitive [1]. They do not require separate conditioning [1][2][3][4]. Self-etch adhesive can be categorized according to the mechanism of clinical application into one-step, which is also called "all-in-one", or two-step self-etch adhesives [1,2,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Self-etch adhesive can be categorized according to the mechanism of clinical application into one-step, which is also called "all-in-one", or two-step self-etch adhesives [1,2,5]. The conventional dentin adhesives, which need a conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid, are etch-and-rinse bonding systems [3][4][5]. There is also a sub-classification according to the number of steps, which are provided in the application [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Six dentin adhesives were tested in vitro regarding their cytotoxicity on human fibroblasts. The adhesives Hybrid Bond, One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Solo Plus and Syntac were eluted with culture medium as single or sequentially applied adhesive part for 24 h. 75 Petri dishes were produced per group. They were evaluated triangulated, comprising the quantitative evaluation (105 ones) to determine “viable”, “dead” and “debris” cells with the use of a cell-counter and the reactivity index was also identified based on the qualitative assessment (420 ones). One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE and Clearfil SE Bond showed a statistical difference of viable cells to the cell control. For One-up Bond F Plus, statistically, differences compared to hybrid bond and Syntac were also found. All the adhesives except One-up Bond F Plus showed significant differences between single and sequentially applied adhesive part regarding the quantitative evaluation. The test material showed a moderate grade of cytotoxicity. As a result, a statistically significant difference of the cytotoxicity between the self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives cannot be demonstrated regarding the qualitative evaluation and the reactivity index, but the differences between sequentially applied and single applied components can be proved.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) has been shown to be one of the most reliable self‐etch adhesive systems , and is considered to be the gold standard for this category of adhesive systems . It offers high bond strength to tooth substrates in laboratory studies and shows promising results in clinical studies . In this study, it is used as representative of classic two‐step self‐etch adhesives.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode

Tsujimoto

Barkmeier

Takamizawa

et al. 2017

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This aim of this study was to compare universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Three universal adhesives - Clearfil Universal, G-Premio Bond, and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive - and three-two-step self-etch adhesives - Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil SE Bond 2, and OptiBond XTR - were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of resin composite bonded to adhesive on dentin in self-etch mode were determined. Scanning electron microscopy observations of fracture surfaces after bond strength tests were also made. The initial shear bond strength of universal adhesives was material dependent, unlike that of two-step self-etch adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive was not significantly different from that of two-step self-etch adhesives, unlike the other universal adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives differed depending on the type of adhesive, unlike those of two-step self-etch adhesives. The results of this study encourage the continued use of two-step self-etch adhesive over some universal adhesives but suggest that changes to the composition of universal adhesives may lead to a dentin bond fatigue durability similar to that of two-step self-etch adhesives.

show abstract

“…The present study selected such aging method with 2000 cycles, because it is known that having too many cycles is not ideal for assessing composite resins. The selection of too many cycles may result in degradation due to higher thermal contraction, chemical degradation due to hot water accelerating the hydrolysis of the adhesive monomer, and stress in the resin-tooth structure interface due to fissure propagation along the interface [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength and marginal microleakage in restorations photopolymerized with LED and halogen light associated with three application modes of a universal adhesive system: in vitro study

Ricardi

Busato

et al. 2019

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to assess the bond strength and marginal microleakage in composite resin restorations, using the Single Bond Universal adhesive system associated with Ultralux (halogen) and Bluephase (LED) light curing units. Methods: For bond strength, 80 healthy human third molars were divided into halogen light (n=40) and LED (n=40), and subdivided according to the following application techniques for the adhesive system: etch-and-rinse (enamel), self-etching (enamel), etch-and-rinse (dentin), and self-etching (dentin). The teeth were subjected to the microtensile test and the fracture pattern was observed under an optical microscope at 40X magnification; they were analyzed by ANOVA, and Fisher and Tukey’s tests (5%). For the marginal microleakage test, 120 class II cavities were prepared in 60 healthy human third molars that were randomly divided into halogen light (n=30) and LED (n=30), and subdivided according to the following application techniques for the adhesive system: etch-and-rinse, selective etching, and self-etching. The teeth were thermocycled 2000 times (±5/55°C), stained in 5% basic fuchsin and sectioned for qualitative and quantitative assessments; they were analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn tests (5%). Results: For the bond strength of enamel and dentin, the adhesive application with prior acid etching was better than self-etching (p<0.0001), regardless of the type of light curing unit (p<0.05). Etch-and-rinse showed the lowest microleakage values (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Etch-and-rinse obtained the best results relative to the other application techniques for the adhesive system in both tests, regardless of the type of light curing unit.

show abstract

Effect of thermocycling on the durability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin

Cited by 25 publications

References 26 publications

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode

Bond strength and marginal microleakage in restorations photopolymerized with LED and halogen light associated with three application modes of a universal adhesive system: in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About