2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the type of immobilization of β-galactosidase on the yield and selectivity of synthesis of transgalactosylated oligosaccharides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GOS conversion yields obtained with β-gal from A. oryzae using other immobilization methods usually range from 15 to 27% [ 47 ], which highlights the good performance of the biocatalysts herein presented. These are remarkable results since immobilized enzymes usually show poorer performance than the free enzymes due to diffusional limitations [ 48 ]. This supports the notion that nanoflowers, or nanocrystals, are not subjected to significant mass transfer limitations due to their large reactive area, suggesting that the vast majority of the immobilized enzymes are highly exposed to the bulk of the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GOS conversion yields obtained with β-gal from A. oryzae using other immobilization methods usually range from 15 to 27% [ 47 ], which highlights the good performance of the biocatalysts herein presented. These are remarkable results since immobilized enzymes usually show poorer performance than the free enzymes due to diffusional limitations [ 48 ]. This supports the notion that nanoflowers, or nanocrystals, are not subjected to significant mass transfer limitations due to their large reactive area, suggesting that the vast majority of the immobilized enzymes are highly exposed to the bulk of the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both GA and Am-GA are based on the same material, small changes in the diffusing component should be expected and the observed differences between both catalysts might be the result of different intrinsic kinetic parameters. In this regard, Guerrero et al (2018) demonstrated that GA standard, GA fine and Am-GA standard have an apparent Michaelis constant for lactose of sevenfold, threefold and fivefold the value of the Michaelis constant of the free enzyme, respectively. Furthermore, Hoffmann et al (2020) demonstrated that the milieu inside the catalyst particle exerts a significant influence on the selectivity of the reaction, i.e., the ratio between the rate of synthesis and the rate of hydrolysis.…”
Section: <0mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The combination of a high porous support and the column system allowed a high volumetric activity, more stability against pH changes, and long term continuous operation, while product composition was very similar with FE and IE. Additionally, authors compared the same system design with IE and immobilized whole cells, Glyoxyl-agarose and amino-glyoxyl-agarose derivatives retained the selectivity of the FE for lactulose synthesis while carboxy- Urrutia et al 2013Urrutia et al , 2018Guerrero et al 2017Guerrero et al , 2018 claiming that IE reactor operated more efficiently regarding stability and FOS production. Nishizawa, Nakajima, and Nabetani (2000) tested immobilization of b-fructofuranosidase on ceramic membranes operating in a forced-flow membrane reactor in order to compare physical adsorption and covalent bonding efficiency.…”
Section: Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%