2022
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Shelving Technique on the Outcome of Embolization in Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in our study, the porosity of the shelfed ReSolv stent was equivalent to that of the Pipeline stent and higher than that of the unshelfed ReSolv stent, yet flow diversion was significantly improved. This implies that the shelf technique for bifurcation aneurysms is different from the compaction technique for sidewall aneurysms, and does not result in a higher metallic ratio at the neck as has been suggested 4. This also seems to indicate that neck coverage is more important than porosity for flow-diverting stents as a determinant of the flow diversion effect, and is in agreement with the suggestion that closing the free stent segment leads to optimal performance 24…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, in our study, the porosity of the shelfed ReSolv stent was equivalent to that of the Pipeline stent and higher than that of the unshelfed ReSolv stent, yet flow diversion was significantly improved. This implies that the shelf technique for bifurcation aneurysms is different from the compaction technique for sidewall aneurysms, and does not result in a higher metallic ratio at the neck as has been suggested 4. This also seems to indicate that neck coverage is more important than porosity for flow-diverting stents as a determinant of the flow diversion effect, and is in agreement with the suggestion that closing the free stent segment leads to optimal performance 24…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The LVIS and Leo stents are intermediate porosity braided devices that can be deployed using a technique that creates a ‘shelf’ at the level of the neck in order to improve neck coverage 2 3. The maneuver required for the shelf technique of these intermediate porosity stents at the aneurysm neck has not been shown to improve the flow diversion effect, thus requiring dense coil packing in addition to stent placement 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most recent report on SAC treatment for WNBAs, the rates of complete occlusion during follow-up and procedure-related permanent morbidity were 80.8%–90.9% and 1.5%–8.6%, respectively. 17 19) Although these studies have shown favorable results, treatment of WNBAs in which both branches are involved in the neck can be very difficult using a single stent. In such cases, developmental techniques such as the waffle cone technique or Y-stent-assisted coiling may be applied.…”
Section: Stent-assisted Coilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) InthemostrecentreportonSACtreatmentforWNBAs, theratesofcompleteocclusionduringfollow-upandprocedure-related permanent morbidity were 80.8%-90.9% and1.5%-8.6%,respectively. [17][18][19] Althoughthesestudies have shown favorable results, treatment of WNBAs in which both branches are involved in the neck can be very difficultusingasinglestent.Insuchcases,developmental techniques such as the waffle cone technique orY-stentassistedcoilingmaybeapplied.Neck-bridgingstentsfor coil embolization not only provide a mechanical scaffolding effect but also lead to the development of flow-diverterstents,focusingontheflow-divertinghemodynamiceffect.…”
Section: Stent-assisted Coilingmentioning
confidence: 99%