2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-03973-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Process Parameters on Machining of GFRP Composites for Different Conditions of Abrasive Water Suspension Jet Machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, maximum of 2.22 g/min, the MRR was obtained. Also, it was noted that maximum pressure and minimum SOD increased the MRR in this work (Ramesha et al , 2019). Holes were made on Nickel 233 alloy using a modified air abrasive jet machining setup.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In this work, maximum of 2.22 g/min, the MRR was obtained. Also, it was noted that maximum pressure and minimum SOD increased the MRR in this work (Ramesha et al , 2019). Holes were made on Nickel 233 alloy using a modified air abrasive jet machining setup.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…But initial and zone SR were affected by SOD as well as jet pressure and AMFR due to changes in kinetic energy and sharpness of cutting particles. Ramesha et al [76] performed a comparative study using AWJ machining in free air and underwater cutting of GFRP laminates. It was found that underwater machining provided lower SR, kerf width, and MRR compared to free air machining due to less jet diameter of underwater machining.…”
Section: Effect Of Jet Pressure Traverse Rate Sod and Amfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several important input parameters that determine the quality of AWJM, namely the nozzle or traverse speed, water pressure, abrasive flow rate, type and size of abrasive grains and standoff distance [ 18 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. The output parameters of the AWJM cutting process are surface roughness, material removal rate, and kerf taper angle.…”
Section: Cutting Processes Of Natural Fiber-reinforced Polymer Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of synthetic fiber composites, Ramesha et al [ 41 ] reported that an increase in stand-off-distance (SoD) water pressure (Wp) led to the increase in MRR, but he had an entirely different view on traverse speed, since there is an inverse relationship between MRR and traverse speed ( Ts ). Ramesha et al [ 41 ] added that abrasive concentration as input parameter, could also help to obtain a higher MRR , the study conducted on glass fiber-reinforced LY556 epoxy. Meanwhile, Mullaikodi et al [ 50 ] reported that the maximum MRR was produced at higher water pressure ( Wp ) and higher abrasive flowrate, but when the traverse speed ( Ts ) was evaluated it was found that the maximum MRR was achieved at higher traverse speed ( Ts ) and medium water pressure ( Wp ) for Kevlar-glass-reinforced epoxy.…”
Section: Cutting Processes Of Natural Fiber-reinforced Polymer Commentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation