2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the presence of colostrum on microbial screening methods for antibiotic detection in goats’ milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the presence of substances in milk related to some farming practices may also lead to "false-positive" results in microbial inhibitor tests. Thus, the presence of colostrum in sheep (Beltrán et al, 2010) and also goat's milk (Romero et al, 2014a) may produce anomalous results. The in vitro presence of antiparasitic substances such as closantel or diazinon in goat's milk produced false-positive results (Romero et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methods To Control Antibiotic Residues In Sheep and Goat's Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the presence of substances in milk related to some farming practices may also lead to "false-positive" results in microbial inhibitor tests. Thus, the presence of colostrum in sheep (Beltrán et al, 2010) and also goat's milk (Romero et al, 2014a) may produce anomalous results. The in vitro presence of antiparasitic substances such as closantel or diazinon in goat's milk produced false-positive results (Romero et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methods To Control Antibiotic Residues In Sheep and Goat's Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to receptor-based tests (rapid methods),Beltrán et al (2013Beltrán et al ( , 2014aBeltrán et al ( , 2014b) studied the characteristics of several specific methods (Charm MRL BLTET, Betastar Combo, SNAP Betalactam, SNAP Tetracycline and TwinsensorBT) to analyse beta-lactams and/or tetracyclines in sheep's and goat's milk (Table 2). The table shows that most substances detected were equal to or below MRLs, presenting also a high specificity for individual samples from sheep and goats with the exception of the Twinsensor test in which false-positives results incremented notably in the case of milk produced at the end of the lactation period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the food safety administration and research towards commercial dairy products is primarily concentrated on the residues detection of microbial contaminants (Jin et al, 2013), heavy metal (Ping, Wang, Wu, & Ying, 2014), pesticide (Shaker & Elsharkawy, 2015) or antibiotics (Romero, Beltr an, P erez-Baena, Rodríguez, & Molina, 2014), and little is on the milk of steroid hormone (Sciascia, Pacheco, & McCoard, 2013;Zheng, Zou, Li, & Machesky, 2013). Classical analytical methods for the determination of E2 in powdered milk were mainly gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCeMS) (Chen et al, 2014), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shi et al, 2011), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry LCeMS (Pape-Zambito, Roberts, & Kensinger, 2010;Zhao, Lin, Li, & Ying, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are nonspecific for antimicrobial agents and may be affected by certain substances in raw milk that are able to inhibit the microbial growth (such as colostrum (Romero et al 2014b), naturally occurring inhibitors (Carlsson et al 1989) or antiparasitic agents (Romero et al 2015)), causing non-compliant results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%