2001
DOI: 10.1017/s1357729800058161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the level of concentrate supplementation, herbage allowance and milk yield at turn-out on the performance of dairy cows in mid lactation at grazing

Abstract: In order to establish the response of dairy cow performance to concentrate supplementation in contrasting grazing conditions and for cows differing in milk yield at turn-out, three experiments were conducted. Each year, two levels of herbage allowance were studied in interaction with four (experiment 1) or three (experiments 2 and 3) levels of concentrate on two groups of 30 to 40 mid-lactation Holstein cows producing between 20 and 46 kg milk at turnout. Amount of concentrate and herbage allowance ranged from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

30
53
5
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
30
53
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported yield increases in response to concentrate feeding (Horan et al 2005). Milk yield with 3 and 6 kg of concentrate was higher (19.2 and 21.7 kg, respectively) than the milk yield of non-supplemented cows (15.1 kg), in agreement with the reports of Delaby et al (2001), Kennedy et al (2003), Sairanen et al (2006) and McEvoy et al (2008). The marginal yield to the use of concentrate was higher when supplementing with 3 kg of concentrate (1.3 kg milk kg -1 concentrate) when compared to supplementation with 6 kg (1.1 kg milk kg -1 of concentrate).…”
Section: Milk Production and Animal Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have reported yield increases in response to concentrate feeding (Horan et al 2005). Milk yield with 3 and 6 kg of concentrate was higher (19.2 and 21.7 kg, respectively) than the milk yield of non-supplemented cows (15.1 kg), in agreement with the reports of Delaby et al (2001), Kennedy et al (2003), Sairanen et al (2006) and McEvoy et al (2008). The marginal yield to the use of concentrate was higher when supplementing with 3 kg of concentrate (1.3 kg milk kg -1 concentrate) when compared to supplementation with 6 kg (1.1 kg milk kg -1 of concentrate).…”
Section: Milk Production and Animal Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…When evaluating the fat production (kg cow -1 day -1 ) Kennedy et al (2007) and Kennedy et al (2008) did not find differences, just as in this study. The increase in pasture allowance caused higher concentrations of milk protein, similar to the reports of Delaby et al (2001) and McEvoy et al (2008), as a consequence of the higher DM and energy intake of the cows. The milk urea (MUN) concentrations were similar among pasture allowances (table 2).…”
Section: Milk Production and Animal Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This milk response is slightly higher than classically observed (Delaby et al, 2001a;Kennedy et al, 2003a;Horan et al, 2005), also resulting from the more severe pasture management applied to the Low group. Indeed, the response to supplementation is enhanced when the herbage allowance or herbage intake level is restricted (Bargo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…An increase in milk production between 0.96 and 1.36 kg/kg concentrate at grazing was observed by Bargo et al (2002), between 0.86 and 1 kg/kg concentrate by Reis and Combs (2000), 1.12 kg/kg concentrate by Jago et al (2007) and 1.04 kg/kg concentrate by Delaby et al (2001). Should periods of high pasture availability not been considered (e.g.…”
Section: Impact On Voluntary Cow Trafficmentioning
confidence: 99%