2011
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury: a single-center randomized clinical trial

Abstract: In patients with sepsis and AKI, increasing the intensity of renal replacement therapy from 50 (HVHF) to 85 mL/kg/h (EHVHF) had no effect on survival at 28 and 90 days.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
72
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current KDIGO guidelines recommend a standard dialysis dose of 35 ml/kg/h to ascertain delivery of at least 25 ml/kg/h [21]. High-volume CVVH does not offer any more benefit [22,23]. …”
Section: Crrt-related Strategies To Avoid Colistin Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current KDIGO guidelines recommend a standard dialysis dose of 35 ml/kg/h to ascertain delivery of at least 25 ml/kg/h [21]. High-volume CVVH does not offer any more benefit [22,23]. …”
Section: Crrt-related Strategies To Avoid Colistin Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm this observation. High-volume hemofiltration has no place in the treatment of SAKI [36,39] now-a-days. In current practice a dialysis dose of 35 ml/kg/h is prescribed to ascertain delivery of at least 25 mL/kg/h.…”
Section: Renal Replacement Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the assumption of 'more being better' in this setting is rather not supported by recent data [3] . In a randomized study enrolling 280 patients with sepsis and AKI, Zhang et al [4] found no differences in survival at 28, 60 and 90 days with treatment doses of 50 and 85 ml/kg/h. A subgroup analysis of septic shock patients treated with the higher dose did not indicate any survival benefit either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%