Background: We developed a simple method to determine the absolute blood volume (V) during hemodialysis in everyday clinical practice and examined its relationship with volume overload, clinical relevance, and accuracy. Methods: The increase in relative blood volume (RBV_post - RBV_pre) measured before and after infusion of 240 ml of ultra-pure dialysate using the bolus function of a commercial online hemodiafiltration machine incorporating a relative blood volume monitor was applied to determine absolute blood volume. The specific blood volume (V_s, blood volume per kg body mass at dry weight, in ml/kg) was compared to volume status as assessed by bioimpedance analysis and clinical criteria. Results: The blood volume measured in 30 stable hemodialysis patients was 6.51 ± 1.70 l at the beginning, corresponding to a specific blood volume of 80.1 ± 12.8 ml/kg, and dropped to 5.84 ± 1.61 l or 72.0 ± 12.1 ml/kg at the end of the dialysis session, respectively. Specific blood volume correlated with volume status assessed both clinically and by bioimpedance analysis. Intradialytic morbid events occurred only in treatments where specific blood volume fell below 65 ml/kg. The reproducibility of the technique was better than 4% and the in vitro accuracy corresponds to a resolution in V_s of better than 1 ml/kg. Conclusion: Absolute blood volume can be easily measured at the beginning of the dialysis session using the current dialysis technology. Information about V and V_s could be a promising tool to avoid intradialytic morbid events. This technique could be completely automated without altering the hardware of currently available online dialysis devices. Therefore, it is recommended that this technique be integrated into all hemodiafiltration machines.

The reduction of blood volume below a critical threshold is assumed to trigger intradialytic morbid events (IME). Recently, we presented a simple method to determine the absolute blood volume during routine hemodialysis (HD) carried out without blood sampling and without injection of dyes or radiolabeled markers. Such information could be used to detect excessive volume reduction during HD and to prevent IME. Therefore, we performed a pilot study in IME-prone patients to identify the absolute blood volume at which they developed clinical symptoms. A volume of 240 mL of ultrapure dialysate was automatically infused into the extracorporeal circulation using the bolus function of a commercial online hemodiafiltration machine incorporating a blood volume monitor (BVM). The increase in relative blood volume (RBV) caused by the infusion was measured and used to determine the absolute blood volume at that time. The blood volume per kilogram body mass at the time of symptomatic IME was also determined. All IME-prone patients of a single-dialysis center were included in the study. Ten out of 12 patients became symptomatic at a specific blood volume between 65 and 56 mL/kg (mean 62 mL/kg) whereas RBV showed a wide scatter (82-97%). A specific blood volume of 65 mL/kg seems to represent the threshold for IME by this method. The technique could be completely automated without altering the hardware of the dialysis device. Present feedback systems for automated blood volume-controlled ultrafiltration could be adapted to maintain absolute blood volume above this critical volume to safely prevent volume-dependent IME.

Adjustment of target weight based on information of Vs, Vo, and IME appears as a feasible approach to reduce the frequency of IME.

Introduction Blood volume changes and vascular refilling during hemodialysis (HD) and ultrafiltration (UF) have been assumed to depend on volume overload (Vo ). It was the aim to study the magnitude of vascular refilling in stable HD patients with moderate volume expansion in everyday dialysis using novel technical approaches. Methods Patients were studied during routine dialysis and UF based on clinical dry weight assessment. Pre-dialysis Vo was independently measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy. Vascular refilling volume (Vref ) was calculated as: Vref  = Vuf  - ΔV, where ΔV is the absolute blood volume change determined by on-line dialysate dilution using a commercial on-line hemodiafiltration machine incorporating a relative blood volume monitor, and where Vuf is the prescribed UF volume. Findings Thirty patients (dry weight: 81.0 ± 17.8 kg) were studied. Pre-dialysis Vo was 2.46 ± 1.45 L. Vuf was 2.27 ± 0.71 L, specific UF rate was 6.45 ± 2.43 mL/kg/h, and since ΔV was 0.66 ± 0.31 L, Vref was determined as 1.61 ± 0.58 L, corresponding to a constant refilling fraction (Fref ) of 70.6 ± 10.6%. Vref strongly correlated with Vuf (r(2)  = 0.82) but was independent of Vo and other volumes. Fref was also independent of Vo and other volumes normalized for various measures of body size. Discussion While vascular refilling and Fref is independent of Vo in treatments with moderate UF requirements, intravascular volume depletion increases with increasing UF requirements. The relationship between blood volume and Vo needs to be more closely examined in further studies to optimize volume control in everyday dialysis.

Extended daily on-line HDF using maximum convective volume seems to improve the outcome of septic MOF, especially in the early phase. The investigated mode of treatment proved to be feasible, well tolerated and highly cost effective compared to conventional CRRT. At present, this procedure would be applicable at every ICU facility with nephrological support.

Background: It is commonly believed that insufficient vascular refilling leads to hypovolemia during hemodialysis and contributes to intradialytic morbid events (IME). But data of refilling volumes at the time of IME are lacking. Methods: We compared the vascular refilling in 10 patients with IME with 14 stable patients with normal blood volume at the dialysis end (66-80 mL/kg). Results: The refilling characteristics in patients with IME did not differ from those in stable patients. The refilling fraction (refilling/ultrafiltration [UF] ratio) was 73.8 ± 9.4% in patients with IME, and 70.2 ± 6.4% in patients with normal blood volume at the end of the treatment. Refilling volume strongly correlated with UF volume in both patient groups (r² = 0.93 and r² = 0.81, respectively). Conclusion: IME are associated with a specific blood volume below 65 mL/kg. Vascular refilling is a constant fraction of UF in stable as well as in symptomatic dialysis sessions.

No abstract

Introduction The success of automatic feedback control systems to improve hemodynamic stability by preventing relative blood volume from dropping beyond a critical value during dialysis is limited. The aim of this study was to use one of these systems for control of absolute rather than relative blood volume to prevent volume‐dependent morbid events. Methods Dialysis was delivered by a machine providing feedback control of ultrafiltration rates, relative blood volume monitoring, and accurate bolus infusion of 240 mL of dialysate to measure absolute blood volume at the beginning of dialysis. Critical relative blood volume required by the control algorithm was calculated from absolute blood volume at the beginning and a critical absolute blood volume of 67 mL/kg. Findings In 40 stable patients, ultrafiltration was guided by blood volume using the feedback algorithm of the integrated program. Blood volume was maintained in a narrow range above the prespecified minimal value of 67 mL/kg. At the end of dialysis, absolute blood volume ranged from 67.5 to 72.5 mL/kg (69.4 ± 1.3 mL/kg). No volume‐dependent intradialytic morbid event occurred. Discussion A feedback control system for relative blood volume‐controlled ultrafiltration can be used for control of absolute blood volume. A prescribed target of absolute blood volume can be converted into relative blood volume, and this can subsequently be reached automatically with the integrated feedback system of the dialysis machine. Intradialytic morbid events could be considerably reduced. The whole procedure could be completely automated without altering the hardware of the dialysis device.