1992
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.46.4161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the dynamic Stark shift on dipole squeezing in two-photon processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate the squeezing properties of the atom, we consider two slowly varying Hermitian conjugate operators [8] (36)…”
Section: -The Squeezing Properties Of the Atommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to investigate the squeezing properties of the atom, we consider two slowly varying Hermitian conjugate operators [8] (36)…”
Section: -The Squeezing Properties Of the Atommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been theoretically shown that the squeezed field can be generated by various physical processes [5]. Meanwhile, the squeezing of the fluctuations of the atomic dipole variables has also received considerable interest [8]. Meanwhile, the squeezing of the fluctuations of the atomic dipole variables has also received considerable interest [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESS on atomic-dipole squeezing in two-photon for an atom started the interaction from a superposition coherent states has been studied [13]. Also, the influence of this shift on the amount of the correlation between the quantum system has been investigated in the two-photon [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the effects of QI become much more profound for large focusing angles; for example, for certain ⌽ in Figs. 3 and 4 it leads to complete suppression of the two-excited-state population 22 . To elaborate more on this point, assuming complete coverage of the atoms by the squeezing ͑i.e., ϭ ͒ it can be shown from Eqs.…”
Section: Squeezing Over a Large Solid Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑55͒ and ͑56͒ must be retained for the solution to be accurate. Figures 2-4 show graphs of the full solution for the excited-state populations 22 and 33 as a function of the focusing angle and of the quantum interference phase ⌽. Clearly, along the ⌽ axis we observe the 2 -periodic structure ͑ periodic in the phase o of the RO͒ of the atomic populations, a direct consequence of quantum interference, while along the dimension we see increasingly interesting features that appear as the solid angle of coverage is increased.…”
Section: Squeezing Over a Large Solid Anglementioning
confidence: 99%