2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(00)90047-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the dietary fiber glucomannan on chronic constipation in neurologically impaired children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
57
0
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
57
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,10,12 Regarding total and segmental colonic transit times, it is difficult to compare our results with the few studies found in the literature, considering that distinct therapy regimens 14,16,24,25 or patients with constipation associated with neurological involvement were analyzed. 15 Regarding our patients with clinical symptoms improved upon Our data also show a higher probability of laxative need after 1 year of treatment in patients with persistence of delayed total colonic transit time at the sixth week of treatment, underscoring the importance of the initial phase of treatment. In Dutch children with functional constipation treated with a therapy regimen similar to that used in the present study, the authors observed that a negative evolution after 1 year of treatment was associated with a total colonic transit time higher than 100 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,8,10,12 Regarding total and segmental colonic transit times, it is difficult to compare our results with the few studies found in the literature, considering that distinct therapy regimens 14,16,24,25 or patients with constipation associated with neurological involvement were analyzed. 15 Regarding our patients with clinical symptoms improved upon Our data also show a higher probability of laxative need after 1 year of treatment in patients with persistence of delayed total colonic transit time at the sixth week of treatment, underscoring the importance of the initial phase of treatment. In Dutch children with functional constipation treated with a therapy regimen similar to that used in the present study, the authors observed that a negative evolution after 1 year of treatment was associated with a total colonic transit time higher than 100 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Only a few articles have analyzed the evolution of the colonic transit time during conventional treatment of chronic constipation, some of them focusing on the effect of dietary fibers or prokinetic drugs on transit time. [12][13][14][15][16] Therefore, the objective of the present study is to analyze the effects of conventional treatment of chronic functional constipation in patients attending a referral outpatient clinic on clinical symptoms, total and segmental colonic transit times, and lactulose and bean test meal orocecal transit times. Chronic constipation was characterized by hard stools that were painful or difficult to pass, associated or not with longer intervals between evacuations, blood mixed with stools, fecal retention, and soiling for over a 3-month period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After giving glucomannan 100 mg/kg twice a day for 12 weeks, this study found improvements in the stool frequency and found no meaningful side effect after the therapy. 17 In this study, we found no nervous disorders. The subjects were given glucomannan with a dose of 100 mg/kg/day during 4 weeks, with average weight 25 kg, so each subjects have 2.5 grams glucomannan per day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…It has been demonstrated that this product is highly effective in the treatment of obesity due to the satiety sensation that it produces [10,11]; as a remedy for constipation, because it increases the feces volume [12]; as hypocholesterolemic agent, interfering in the transport of cholesterol and of bile acids [10,13]; and as hypoglycemic and hypoinsulinemic agent probably by delaying gastric emptying and slowing glucose delivery to the intestinal mucosa [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%