2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.09.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the bridge substitution on the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] As an electron spacer to connect the donor and acceptor, the p-linker determines not only the light-harvesting characteristics of the chromophore, but also the electron injection from the excited dyes to the TiO 2 surface, accompanied by electron donor and acceptor moieties. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] To date, the design of sensitizers with good photovoltaic properties has focused primarily on engineering (i) the electronic nature of the D and A moieties and (ii) the conjugation of the p-linker. The former controls the D-A mixing with respect to a specic bridge, while the latter plays a key role in modulating D-A electronic coupling as well as the magnitude of the change in dipole moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] As an electron spacer to connect the donor and acceptor, the p-linker determines not only the light-harvesting characteristics of the chromophore, but also the electron injection from the excited dyes to the TiO 2 surface, accompanied by electron donor and acceptor moieties. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] To date, the design of sensitizers with good photovoltaic properties has focused primarily on engineering (i) the electronic nature of the D and A moieties and (ii) the conjugation of the p-linker. The former controls the D-A mixing with respect to a specic bridge, while the latter plays a key role in modulating D-A electronic coupling as well as the magnitude of the change in dipole moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precursor aldehyde 4 was prepared in 29% yield by Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction between porphyrin phosphonate 1 [13] and trans-bis-(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)vinylenebiscarbaldehyde (3) [14] at room temperature in the presence of NaH as base and under careful stoichiometric conditions (Scheme 1). Compound 4 was fully characterized by spectroscopic techniques; the 1 H NMR showed, the formyl proton at d = 9.91 ppm and all the rest of the expected signals; particularly interesting is that the E configuration of both double bonds are confirmed by the measured coupling constant values (J = 16 Hz in both cases).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaction of phosphonate 4 and aldehyde 2 in the presence of NaH afforded 2 EDOTV in 53 %. On the other hand, reaction of phosphonate 4 with aldehydes 5 [14] or 6 [15] (stoichiometry 2:1) by using the same base, gave rise to oligomers 3 EDOTV and 4 EDOTV in 26 and 20 %, respectively. All new compounds were fully characterised by 1 H and 13 C NMR and FTIR spectroscopy as well as MALDI mass spectrometry (see Figures S1-17 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%