2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0590-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy

Abstract: The aim of the study to compare outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with different body mass index (BMI) scores and to explore whether the BMI has an effect on outcomes of RIRS. Five hundred and two patients who underwent flexible URS in 3 centers between 2008 and 2012 for the management of single upper urinary tract calculi were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as normal weight BMI 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m(2), overweight 25 to 29.99 kg/m(2), obese 30 to 39.99 kg/m(2) and morbid obes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a subanalysis, FURS had poorer SFR in obese patients for stones > 20 mm [46]. However, multiple further studies have found no difference in SFR with URS for normal-weight patients (60.8-70.7%) compared with obese patients (65-79.4%) [47][48][49], even for large stone sizes (> 20 mm) [48]. There was also no significant difference between complication rates for normal-weight patients and obese patients [47,49].…”
Section: Interventional Managementmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, in a subanalysis, FURS had poorer SFR in obese patients for stones > 20 mm [46]. However, multiple further studies have found no difference in SFR with URS for normal-weight patients (60.8-70.7%) compared with obese patients (65-79.4%) [47][48][49], even for large stone sizes (> 20 mm) [48]. There was also no significant difference between complication rates for normal-weight patients and obese patients [47,49].…”
Section: Interventional Managementmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A high BMI additionally influenced the outcome of ESWL negatively due to difficult stone location and increased skin-to-stone distance with attenuation of the application of shock wave energy [25]. Sari et al [11] investigated the effect of the BMI on outcome of fURS. The average BMI was 26 with a distribution of normal weighted patients being 43%, overweight 32%, obese 22% and morbidly obese 3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, successful ESWL is dependent on skin-to-stone distance, resulting in poorer results in obese patients [10]. In contrast, no negative influence regarding body mass index (BMI) on the stone free rate was documented for fURS [11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of fURS for obese and morbidly obese patients has been evaluated in various studies, and SFR and complication rates were found to be not affected by body mass index. [27][28][29] …”
Section: Rirs In Anticoagulated Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%