2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature on the development of skeletal deformities in Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
88
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
88
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, growth enhancement with temperature might also present some disadvantages, because faster larval growth was accompanied by an increase in the incidence of skeletal deformities. Indeed, temperature is known to be one of the most important environmental factors that can induce morphological deformities during fish development (Aritaki and Seikai, 2004;Georgakopoulou et al, 2010;Dionísio et al, 2012). Additionally, pH may also affect the prevalence of fish skeletal deformities (Lall and Lewis-McCrea, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, growth enhancement with temperature might also present some disadvantages, because faster larval growth was accompanied by an increase in the incidence of skeletal deformities. Indeed, temperature is known to be one of the most important environmental factors that can induce morphological deformities during fish development (Aritaki and Seikai, 2004;Georgakopoulou et al, 2010;Dionísio et al, 2012). Additionally, pH may also affect the prevalence of fish skeletal deformities (Lall and Lewis-McCrea, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of these skeletal deformities is not well understood and may be related to nutritional, environmental and genetic factors (Fernández et al, 2008;Boglione et al, 2014). Many researchers have proposed a variety of abiotic factors, such as environmental temperature, high swimming activity, photoperiod, tank colour, water temperature (Tandler et al, 1995;Kihara et al, 2002;Trotter et al, 2003;Sfakianakis et al, 2006;Cobcroft and Battaglene, 2009;Georgakopoulou et al, 2010;Prestinicola et al, the skeletal deformities downgrade the biological performance of the reared fish and the image of the final product, both negatively affecting the production cost and the market value (Divanach et al, 1996;Boglione et al, 2014). A 50% reduction of skeletal anomalies could save European aquaculture D 25,000,000 per year, while the estimated minimum annual loss due to skeletal anomalies is more than D 50,000,000 (Hough, 2009;Boglione et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, deformation can negatively impact fish growth, survival, swimming, food conversion, and susceptibility to stress and pathogens (Andrades et al 1996;Koumoundourous et al 1997;Boglione et al 2001). Though the rearing environment (e.g., temperature, salinity, water current, dissolved oxygen, and tank color) (Koumoundouros et al 1999(Koumoundouros et al , 2001Hattori et al 2004;Sfakianakis et al 2004;Okamoto et al 2009;Georgakopoulou et al 2010;Owen et al 2012), genetic factors (Ferguson and Danzmann 1998;Castro et al 2007;Ma et al 2014c), parasites and pesticides (Kusuda and Sugiyama 1981;Liang et al 2012;Liu et al 2012) can affect fish bone development, more and more evidence has demonstrated that nutritional factors during larval fish rearing can directly cause fish deformity (Andrades et al 1996;Afonso et al 2000;Cahu et al 2003a;Sandel et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%