1990
DOI: 10.1109/27.61519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of targets on plasma focus dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples are mounted on a substrate holder at an axial distance of 8 cm above the anode tip behind a moveable aluminium shutter. This distance of specimen not only ensures avoiding the perturbation of plasma dynamics and focusing action [26] but also prevents the mere damage of the sample due to high energy density of ion beams. The aluminium shutter covering the sample is used to avoid the effects of ion beams emitted during the few conditioning shots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples are mounted on a substrate holder at an axial distance of 8 cm above the anode tip behind a moveable aluminium shutter. This distance of specimen not only ensures avoiding the perturbation of plasma dynamics and focusing action [26] but also prevents the mere damage of the sample due to high energy density of ion beams. The aluminium shutter covering the sample is used to avoid the effects of ion beams emitted during the few conditioning shots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anode is engraved 10 mm deep at the tip to reduce the copper impurities. Further details of plasma focus system are given elsewhere [12,26,28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrow labelled as '1' points to the main current sheath whose central part, closer to the anode, participated in the first pinch earlier while the outer part, which is not disintegrated, is still in axial motion down the chamber. In fact, the shadow images shown in figures 11(b) and (d) clearly show the bubble formation on the frontal part of the current sheath marked by arrow '1', which is the evidence of strong focusing action during the first pinch (refer figure 6(c) of [32], figure 6(b) of [33] and last shadow images in figures 7(a), (b) and (c) of this paper). It has been reported that the m = 0 instabilities enhance the induced electric field which accelerates ions towards the top of the chamber which in turn cause an ionization front which soon overtakes the axial shock front (formed due to axial expansion of the current sheath) and develops into a bubble structure [34].…”
Section: Discussion On Shadowgraphic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The shadowgraphic system used in the present study, shown in figure 2, is similar to that given by Lee et al [26]. This shadowgraphic system uses a home-made nitrogen laser, with the laser gap being operated at the atmospheric pressure of the commercially available N 2 gas.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%