1993
DOI: 10.1117/12.146388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of system point spread function, apparent size, and detector instantaneous field of view on the infrared image contrast of small objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike extended object detection described above, when image size of observed object is somewhat smaller or comparable to detector size, the object cannot be resolved by system. In this case, optical blurring limits image size of object, and changes light-intensity distribution in the scope of the detector [1,2,9], shown as Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, unlike extended object detection described above, when image size of observed object is somewhat smaller or comparable to detector size, the object cannot be resolved by system. In this case, optical blurring limits image size of object, and changes light-intensity distribution in the scope of the detector [1,2,9], shown as Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its image size is much smaller than detector size. This limiting case is of much interest, where the system is viewing point-target [1][2][3]9,[11][12][13]. In point-target detection, optical blurring must be taken into account, especially when system is operated in infrared band where optics diffraction causes more distortion to point-target image [1,2,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations