2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface roughness on elastic limit of silicon nanowires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By summarizing all successful tests on both VLS-grown Si nanowires and top-down etched Si nanowires in Fig. 4D for statistical analysis, we can see that the presence of surface roughness and possibly other etch-induced defects, such as porosity ( 45 , 46 ), can significantly reduce the elastic limit of Si nanowires, which agrees with previous experiments (with fracture strengths of ~4 to 5 GPa) on metal-assisted, catalytically etched Si nanowires ( 47 ) as well as a recent molecular dynamics simulation result ( 48 ). It might also be noted that earlier studies on VLS growth of Si nanowires suggested that <110>-oriented nanowires could generally have smoother sidewalls compared to <111>-oriented wires ( 49 ), so again we believe that the smooth surfaces make a big difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By summarizing all successful tests on both VLS-grown Si nanowires and top-down etched Si nanowires in Fig. 4D for statistical analysis, we can see that the presence of surface roughness and possibly other etch-induced defects, such as porosity ( 45 , 46 ), can significantly reduce the elastic limit of Si nanowires, which agrees with previous experiments (with fracture strengths of ~4 to 5 GPa) on metal-assisted, catalytically etched Si nanowires ( 47 ) as well as a recent molecular dynamics simulation result ( 48 ). It might also be noted that earlier studies on VLS growth of Si nanowires suggested that <110>-oriented nanowires could generally have smoother sidewalls compared to <111>-oriented wires ( 49 ), so again we believe that the smooth surfaces make a big difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[ 21 ] In addition to the geometric scaling, intrinsic effects associated with the surfaces and defects in NWs also contribute to their high deformability. [ 22 ] Bending experiments on Si NWs showed a high fracture strength (≈18 GPa) approaching the theoretical strength of ≈20 GPa, as compared with typical values of ≈1.5 GPa for bulk samples. [ 23,24 ] In situ tensile tests in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that Si NWs can withstand 10% of cyclic tensile strains without fracture (Figure 1c), which is far beyond the ultimate tensile strain of bulk Si (≈1%).…”
Section: The Toolbox Of Soft Electronic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lyon et al [8] theoretically studied the effects of roughness at the atomic scale on the surface plasmon excitation, and found visible effects of the surface roughness on the image potential and stopping power. Through a molecular dynamics simulation, Liu et al [9] found that the surface roughness plays a significant role in the plasticity initiation of silicon nanowires. Nunez and Polycarpou [10] experimentally investigated the effects of the counterpart surface roughness on the formation of a transfer layer from the polymer films for application to dry or solid lubrication, and determined the dependence of the friction coefficient and wear rate on the surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%