2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface roughness and temperature on stainless steel - Whey protein interfacial interactions under pasteurisation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SS presents a high surface roughness, both advancing and receding CAs on SS are less than those on ABS and melamine, which is likely attributed to the hydrophilic nature of SS, while ABS and melamine are less polar. This supports our observation of artificial saliva CAs on the solid substrates and is consistent with our previous experimental work in which SS samples of different surface finishing were investigated [ 41 ]. It is worth noting that substrates such as SS, ABS and melamine, whether smooth or rough, can present high advancing CA but low receding CA, suggesting that it is possible for those less polar substrates to have an increased interaction with the artificial saliva once the surface is already wet, while it would not have been the case when dry.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although SS presents a high surface roughness, both advancing and receding CAs on SS are less than those on ABS and melamine, which is likely attributed to the hydrophilic nature of SS, while ABS and melamine are less polar. This supports our observation of artificial saliva CAs on the solid substrates and is consistent with our previous experimental work in which SS samples of different surface finishing were investigated [ 41 ]. It is worth noting that substrates such as SS, ABS and melamine, whether smooth or rough, can present high advancing CA but low receding CA, suggesting that it is possible for those less polar substrates to have an increased interaction with the artificial saliva once the surface is already wet, while it would not have been the case when dry.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Fouling is the unwanted deposition of a product on a processing surface, and it results in production inefficiencies such as reduced heat transfer rates and increased pressure drop across heat exchangers. Complex interactions between a product’s physical (i.e., viscosity) and chemical properties (i.e., composition), , processing conditions (i.e., fluid mechanics), , and the processing surface (i.e., roughness, surface energetics) , significantly influence how a product fouls, as well as how it cleans. Cleaning, often in the form of clean-in-place (CIP) practices, is required to restore hygiene after fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the roughness features of these coatings should align with the regulations and standards related to surface finishing for food applications. For example, there is a general consensus that surfaces in contact with food should meet specific surface roughness criteria, such as Ra ≤ 0.8 µm, to ensure hygienic equipment design [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the regulations and standards related to surface finishing for food applications. For example, there is a general consensus that surfaces in contact with food should meet specific surface roughness criteria, such as Ra ≤ 0.8 µm, to ensure hygienic equipment design [41]. For the chemical modification of the LDPE film, a fluorine-ended silane compound was selected owing to its high reactivity with nano-silica particles [42].…”
Section: Characterization Of Srs-embedded Ldpe Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%