Effect of Surface Immobilization on Intramolecular and Intermolecular Electron Transfer in a Chromophore−Donor−Acceptor Assembly

Abstract

A chromophore-donor-acceptor assembly [Ru(bpyCOOH)(bpyCH(2)MV(2+)) (bpyCH(2)PTZ)](4+)(1) (where bpyCOOH = 4-carboxylic acid-4'-methyl-2,2'-bipyridine, bpyCH(2)MV(2+) = 1-[(4'-methyl-2,2'-bipyridin-4-yl)methyl]-1'-methyl-4,4'-bipyridinediium, and bpyCH(2)PTZ = 10-[(4'-methyl-2,2'-bipyridin-4-yl)methyl]phenothiazine) has been adsorbed on the surface of nanocrystalline ZrO(2) and its excited state properties studied by emission and transient absorption spectroscopy. In deaerated acetonitrile solution, the complex emits weakly with an emission quantum yield of phi(em) approximately equal to 0.01 with an excited-state lifetime of tau approximately equal to 20 ps. Emission from the surface-adsorbed complex is intense, with phi(em) approximately equal to 0.4 and tau approximately equal to 40 ns. The increase in emission on the surface is likely due to a significant inhibition to the electron-transfer quenching of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited state caused by surface adsorption-induced changes in the redox potentials. Transient (nanosecond time scale) absorption monitoring, following laser flash photolysis, reveals the presence of a transient or transients that are formed during the flash. Transient spectral changes that occur during and after the flash are consistent with the formation and decay of the intermediate ZrO(2)-[Ru(bpyCOOH)(bpyCH(2)MV(+*))(bpyCH(2)PTZ(+*))](4+). It returns to the ground state by both intramolecular and intermolecular processes. Intramolecular electron transfer occurs with k(BET) = 6.3 x 10(6) s(-1) (tau = 160 ns), which is comparable to the rate constant for back-electron transfer in solution. The back-electron transfer is a second-order process and is much slower, with k(BET) = 390 M(-1) s(-1) (tau = 2.6 ms).

Chemical Approaches to Artificial Photosynthesis. 2

“…(2) Excitation of [Ru(4,4‘-(COOH) 2 bpy)(bpy−PTZ)(bpy−MV 2+ )] 4+ adsorbed to ZrO 2 gives (MV •+ )Ru(PTZ •+ ), which subsequently undergoes MV + → PTZ + back electron transfer on the same time scale (τ ∼ 140 ns) as in solution. A competing pathway gives spatially separated (MV •+ )Ru(PTZ) and (MV 2+ )Ru(PTZ •+ ), and back electron transfer is far slower, >1 ms, depending on surface coverage …”

Photophysical properties of metal complexes

“…115 A phenothiazine/[Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ / viologen donor-chromophore-acceptor triad luminesces strongly when adsorbed onto ZrO 2 due to inhibition of the Ruviologen PET process caused by changes in redox potentials following adsorption. 116 The properties of complex IV vary with the twist angle between the bpy ligand and the attached pyridinium unit, which depend on the nature of the groups R; when y E 901 the [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ unit is quenched by PET to the pyridinium unit which has its own localised nature; when y E 01 the pyridinum unit acts like an electron-withdrawing substituent generating a luminescent 3 MLCT state which is highly delocalised over the bpy/pyridinium assembly. 117 Covalent attachment of a [Ru(terpy) 2 ] 2+ chromophore to dipyrromethene/BF 2 'bodipy' fluorophores results in [Ru(terpy) 2 ] 2+bodipy PEnT at 77 K with consequent long-lived (50 ms) sensitised red emission from the bodipy unit.…”