2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface chemistry on the dispersion and pH-responsiveness of chitin nanofibers/ natural rubber latex nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main industrial challenge of adopting the 3DP of biomass-based nanocomposites relies on the compatibility of the feedstock materials. ,, For instance, similar to what has been observed in cellulosic materials and their derivatives, the hydrophilicity of CNWs tends to lower their dispersion and distribution in many 3D-printable hydrophobic polymer matrices. Such an incompatibility introduces printing inaccuracy and nonuniformity and may potentially lower the thermomechanical properties of the printed material. To resolve this compatibility issue, many nanofillers are often surface-functionalized by reactive functional organic groups. ,, Due to various surface chemistries available for polysaccharides, functionalizing CNWs offers a wide variety of opportunities, in which they can not only be easily performed but also introduce unique and exciting properties for the resulting nanocomposite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main industrial challenge of adopting the 3DP of biomass-based nanocomposites relies on the compatibility of the feedstock materials. ,, For instance, similar to what has been observed in cellulosic materials and their derivatives, the hydrophilicity of CNWs tends to lower their dispersion and distribution in many 3D-printable hydrophobic polymer matrices. Such an incompatibility introduces printing inaccuracy and nonuniformity and may potentially lower the thermomechanical properties of the printed material. To resolve this compatibility issue, many nanofillers are often surface-functionalized by reactive functional organic groups. ,, Due to various surface chemistries available for polysaccharides, functionalizing CNWs offers a wide variety of opportunities, in which they can not only be easily performed but also introduce unique and exciting properties for the resulting nanocomposite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference nanocomposite containing the same weight fraction of unmodified CNCs (PMETAC/CNC-OH) displayed an E ′ of 4.0 GPa at 25 °C, i.e., the reinforcement is much less pronounced. Such a difference, along with the high extent of reinforcement relative to nanocomposites of other glassy polymers and CNCs, , and the fact that a substantial increase is seen between 28 and 33 wt % filler in the PMETAC/CNC-COONa nanocomposites (a concentration range for which percolation models predict only small increases), suggest that electrostatic interactions influence the mechanical properties of the PMETAC/CNC-COONa nanocomposites considerably. , Electrostatic interactions also govern the stress transfer between the matrix and the CNCs as well as improve the dispersion of the filler.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Introducing rigid nano-fillers is an effective way to reinforce and functionalize the rubber materials. In recent years, increasing attentions are drawn to bio-based reinforcing nano-fillers including chitin, [19][20][21][22] cellulose, 23,24 and lignin 25,26 on account of their non-toxicity, good biodegradability and good biocompatibility. Chitosan (CS) is a natural polysaccharide derived by the deacetylation of chitin, a major component of crustacean shells of crabs, shrimps, or prawns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%