2012
DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2011.639116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sulfobutyl Ether Beta-Cyclodextrin Modifier on Selectivity of Reversed Phase HPLC Separations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For similar methods published in literature, no selectivity was reported. On the other hand, resolution was measured instead [33], or it was stated as no separation for TER was achieved on octadecylsilane with the use of HP-βCD in the mobile phase [31]. Other reports using native beta cyclodextrins as CMPA rather than using substituted ones showed slightly lower selectivity values for TER to the values in our study [32].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For similar methods published in literature, no selectivity was reported. On the other hand, resolution was measured instead [33], or it was stated as no separation for TER was achieved on octadecylsilane with the use of HP-βCD in the mobile phase [31]. Other reports using native beta cyclodextrins as CMPA rather than using substituted ones showed slightly lower selectivity values for TER to the values in our study [32].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…A moderate concentration (3-8 mM) of SBE-β-CD led to a good separation at a wide range of buffer concentration (5-50 mM, Figure 6B). A mixed modal interaction involving ion pairing, hydrogen bonding, and inclusion complex at the hydrophobic cavity are most likely occurring [33]. Separation in a slightly acidic medium (pH = 3.5) guarantees the unionization of some sulfonic groups (pKa = 2), where partitioning with the reversed phase takes place along with the presence of some other ionized sulfonic groups eluting in the mobile phase paired with TER.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Enantioseparation of Orc has been carried out in the present case via synthesis of diastereomeric derivatives with CDRs 1–6, diastereomeric derivatives of Orc prepared with CDR 1 were separated with the R s 8.84, which is better than enantioseparation of Orc reported in literature 8.26 with ( R )‐5‐fluoro‐2,4‐dinitro‐ n ‐(1‐phenylethyl)benzenamine [8] by indirect approach and R s is also higher than that obtained using chiral column (direct approach), for example, R s was 0.8 using sulfobutyl ether β‐cyclodextrin [6], 4.68 using cellulose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) [20], 2.03 using sulfated‐β‐cyclodextrin [21], and 3.95 using methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin [22]. A comparison of R s and LOD by direct approach using different CSPs, chiral selectors, and chiral inducing reagents (CIRs) is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In literature, both direct and indirect approaches have been reported to achieve enantioseparation of Bel and Orc. HPLC resolution of enantiomers of Bel [2][3][4][5][6] and that of Orc [6] by direct approach has been carried out using certain chiral stationary phases (CSPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%