The valorisation of corn coproducts as feedstuffs relies not only on the large available quantities but also on their special feeding characteristics (1-3). Corn processing supplies the feed market with a broad range of coproducts from the production of alcohol, starch, oil, sweeteners, etc. (4), which favours better adaptability of the feeding strategies to various practical situations (5). Moreover, the new processing techniques (6,7) aim to extract as much as possible from the raw materials, especially fractions with high economic value such as starch, fructose, oil, coatings, textiles, adhesives, etc. (8,9), and to fractionate the raw materials into high-, mid-, and low-value components that can be used for targeted markets and specific uses (6,10). This continuously generates novel or updated coproducts available for farm animal feeding; however, these coproducts are often marketed under misleading or incorrect names or they have variable quality and nutritive values (11,12), which impairs their efficient use in animal nutrition.Coproducts from corn milling have been extensively studied in the last decades from various angles: the nutritive value and its variability, the processing conditions, the inclusion in various feeding strategies, and the effects on animal performance, digestibility of fibre fractions, quality of proteins (dynamics of rumen degradability, amino acids), etc., such that most of them are well described in the literature (4,11,13). On the other hand, certain changes in the processing techniques led to coproducts that significantly differ from the classical ones in terms of nutritive value, effects on rumen metabolism and animal performances, their use in feeding strategies, etc. (12,14).Of these emerging coproducts, two were selected for this review based on their novelty, the critical mass of scientific knowledge, and the issues raised by their valorisation in ruminant feeding: high-protein distillers' grains (HPDG) and reduced-fat distillers' grains (RFDG). Although reported in the recent literature, these feeds are not yet included in publicly available feeding tables such as Feedipedia, Norfor, etc., and they clearly differ from