2015
DOI: 10.4103/0976-237x.169841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of storage time and framework design on the accuracy of maxillary cobalt-chromium cast removable partial dentures

Abstract: Statement of Problem:Inaccuracies in the fit of palatal major connectors may be related to distortion of the wax pattern due to prolonged storage time and faulty major connector design.Purpose:This in vitro study was carried out to find out the effect of storage time and major connector design on the accuracy of cobalt-chromium cast removable partial dentures (RPDs).Materials and Methods:A brass metal die with a Kennedy Class III, modification 1, the partially edentulous arch was used as a master die. Thirty-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Traditional RPD design involves the production of stone casts, geometric characterization of the tooth and soft tissues related to the path of insertion, and careful designation of RPD components (major and minor connectors, rests, clasps, and base retention) using a direct waxing method. 3,19 Current digital technologies enable the design of RPD components on 3-dimensional (3D) representations of the patient instead of stone casts by using geometric analysis tools that create designs of micrometer-level accuracy that can be viewed in cross section. The virtual model can then be used to print wax for casting metal frameworks or the direct printing or milling of metal or resin frameworks.…”
Section: Rpd Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Traditional RPD design involves the production of stone casts, geometric characterization of the tooth and soft tissues related to the path of insertion, and careful designation of RPD components (major and minor connectors, rests, clasps, and base retention) using a direct waxing method. 3,19 Current digital technologies enable the design of RPD components on 3-dimensional (3D) representations of the patient instead of stone casts by using geometric analysis tools that create designs of micrometer-level accuracy that can be viewed in cross section. The virtual model can then be used to print wax for casting metal frameworks or the direct printing or milling of metal or resin frameworks.…”
Section: Rpd Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for quantitative evaluation of fitness in this study was based on PVS replica method described by Parker [14], which was always used in evaluating the fitness of clasp assembly in the field of removable partial denture study [15][16][17]. Then, many 2D measuring instruments including micrometers [18,19], profile projectors [20,21] and stereo microscopes [7,22] were used to measure the space in these studies. These instruments had been tried in this study, but it was difficult to orient the same anatomy position in two replicas and prone to bring error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate fit of maxillary frameworks with palatal strap major connector was selected to be evaluated in this study as the palatal major connector was indicated to be the most common site for inaccurate fit of RPD as reported by many investigators (2, 8, 19,20,22,23) . A master metal cast fabricated by split mold process using brass material was preferred for laboratory verification in this study, because it was more resistant to abrasion on repeated insertion and removal of the metal frameworks during evaluation procedure (17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auto polymerized fast set acrylic resin material (Duralay) was used to measure this gap as it has fine grain size that offer fast set, sufficient flow, superior accuracy and rigidity in thin sections that does not distort when being measured with a micrometer caliper (8,22,24) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%