2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Stepped Care on Sexual Interest and Enjoyment in Distressed Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Introduction: A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) with psychological distress showed that a stepped care (SC) program targeting psychological distress compared with care as usual (CAU), is (cost)effective in reducing psychological distress. Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether SC can coalleviate problems with sexual interest and enjoyment. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the presence of an unmet sexual health need and having … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most had a medium to high risk of bias. Among the 13 randomized studies, there were 12 with a medium 13,14,16,18,20 to high 12,15,17,19,[21][22][23] risk of bias, and only one study with a low 24 risk of bias.…”
Section: Quality Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most had a medium to high risk of bias. Among the 13 randomized studies, there were 12 with a medium 13,14,16,18,20 to high 12,15,17,19,[21][22][23] risk of bias, and only one study with a low 24 risk of bias.…”
Section: Quality Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common sources of bias were lack of concealment of allocation, heterogeneity of baseline participant characteristics, or unclear/lack of blinding of the participants, assessors, or those delivering the study intervention. Additional reasons for introduction of bias included incomplete information on follow-up of participants, 15 limited information on power calculations, 14,21,22 and lack of target accrual 13 or patient attrition. 19 The 15 non-randomized studies included 12 with a high risk of bias 25,27,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and three with a medium risk of bias.…”
Section: Quality Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general characteristics of the studies included in the review (n = 9) can be found in Table 2. The articles were published from 2018 to 2021 in a variety of scientific journals with different aims and scopes: Indian journal of palliative care [19], Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer [20], Sexual Medicine [21], Psycho-oncology [22], Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [23], Indian journal of palliative care [24], Psycho-oncology [25], Surgery [26], Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal [27]. All the records were written in English.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study 2 [20] included 87 patients, with a mean age of 66 years, divided into a total of 5 groups: oral cavity (n = 17), oropharynx (n = 20), hypopharynx (n = 5), larynx (n = 29) and others (n = 16), from the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Study 3 [21] consisted of 134 HNC survivors (males = 44/females = 23), with a mean age of 66 years, who were divided into a total of 3 HNC localizations: lip/oral/cavity/oropharynx (n = 29), hypopharynx/larynx (n = 21), other head and neck cancers (n = 17), randomized to investigate differences in the course of sexual interest and sexual pleasure between a care program targeting psychological distress compared to usual care and a control, at the clinic of Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam UMC), location VU University medical center. Study 4 [22] is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03518671) and was conducted with 10 HNC survivors.…”
Section: Participants and Regroupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation