2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of statin on progression of symptomatic basilar artery stenosis and subsequent ischemic stroke

Abstract: Background and objectiveSymptomatic basilar artery stenosis (BAS) is associated with high risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. We aimed to investigate whether statin therapy might prevent the progression of symptomatic BAS and stroke recurrence.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with acute ischemia with symptomatic BAS, which was assessed using magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) imaging on admission day, and 1 year later (or the day of the clinical event). The clinical endpoints were recurr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medical therapy, such as statins and antihypertensives, should be considered for the long-term secondary prevention of stroke. In a retrospective study of 153 patients with symptomatic BA stenosis, Yum et al [8] reported a much lower stroke recurrence of 14.9% for patients taking statins, compared to 35.9% in those that did not. They also reported progression of the BA stenosis in 7.0% of patients in the statin group compared to 28.2% in the non-statin group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical therapy, such as statins and antihypertensives, should be considered for the long-term secondary prevention of stroke. In a retrospective study of 153 patients with symptomatic BA stenosis, Yum et al [8] reported a much lower stroke recurrence of 14.9% for patients taking statins, compared to 35.9% in those that did not. They also reported progression of the BA stenosis in 7.0% of patients in the statin group compared to 28.2% in the non-statin group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, 9 studies that met the criteria were contained in this meta-analysis. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] As shown in Table 1, a total of 9 RCTs and 15,497 study subjects (prevention group [n = 4114], control group [n = 11383]) were contained in this meta-analysis. The included eligible studies were published from 2002 to 2019, and the locations of studies were mainly in Asia, America, and Europe.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%