2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of spatial inhomogeneity of charge carrier mobility on current–voltage characteristics in organic field-effect transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b for the cr‐PVA/PEDOT/CuPc device corresponds to the mobility dependence µ ∝ [1–exp (– z/λ )] mentioned above, except for the slight decrease after the µ maximum around l 0 ≈ 15 nm. This can be verified by considering an average mobility given by μtrue¯=l010l0μfalse(zfalse)normaldz=μ0l010l0[1exp(z/λ)]dz=μ0{1λtrue/l0[1exp(l0/λ)]}, where μ 0 is the mobility in the bulk and λ a constant of the order of the molecular dimensions . Equation (5) fits the experimental data with PEDOT in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…b for the cr‐PVA/PEDOT/CuPc device corresponds to the mobility dependence µ ∝ [1–exp (– z/λ )] mentioned above, except for the slight decrease after the µ maximum around l 0 ≈ 15 nm. This can be verified by considering an average mobility given by μtrue¯=l010l0μfalse(zfalse)normaldz=μ0l010l0[1exp(z/λ)]dz=μ0{1λtrue/l0[1exp(l0/λ)]}, where μ 0 is the mobility in the bulk and λ a constant of the order of the molecular dimensions . Equation (5) fits the experimental data with PEDOT in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…4b for the cr-PVA/PEDOT/CuPc device corresponds to the mobility dependence m / [1-exp (-z/l)] mentioned above, except for the slight decrease after the m maximum around l 0 % 15 nm. This can be verified by considering an average mobility given by [6,16]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sworakowski and co-workers used a mobility dependence on the distance z to the interface given by the function μ ∝ [1 -exp(-z/λ)] (where λ is a constant of the order of the molecular dimensions) to account for the interface neighborhood imposed mobility decay. 30,31 The variation in the average mobility with respect to l 0 , when the effective channel bottleneck reaches its minimum thickness (|V GS -V T | → ∞) can then be described using:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%