2013
DOI: 10.2478/acas-2013-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of source and sink limitation on yield and some agronomic characteristics in modern bread wheat cultivars under post anthesis water deficiency / OMEJITVENI VPLIV VIRA IN PONORA NA PRIDELEK IN NEKATERE AGRONOMSKE LASTNOSTI NOVEJŠIH SORT KRUŠNE PŠENICE V RAZMERAH POMANJKANJA VODE PO ANTEZI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in another study, drought stress during the grain-filling period reduced the net photosynthetic rate of the barley flag leaf, but had no influence on the grain-filling rate at a severe vapour pressure deficit [59]. Abdoli and Saeidi [60] observed that the net photosynthetic rate decreased with chlorophyll content, which was accompanied by a decrease in stomatal conductance. The controlled severe drought imposed during the vegetative stage decreased photosynthesis and plant growth in both barley genotypes in a similar manner [61].…”
Section: Gaseous Exchange Parameters Towards Drought Tolerancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…While in another study, drought stress during the grain-filling period reduced the net photosynthetic rate of the barley flag leaf, but had no influence on the grain-filling rate at a severe vapour pressure deficit [59]. Abdoli and Saeidi [60] observed that the net photosynthetic rate decreased with chlorophyll content, which was accompanied by a decrease in stomatal conductance. The controlled severe drought imposed during the vegetative stage decreased photosynthesis and plant growth in both barley genotypes in a similar manner [61].…”
Section: Gaseous Exchange Parameters Towards Drought Tolerancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several other studies, carried out in different parts of the world, have addressed the response of wheat grain weight to changes in source/sink ratios by mechanical or chemical defoliation, grain removal, stand reduction or shading. As a result, a low degree of source limitation in the absence of water stress and other adversities (biotic and abiotic) during grain filling has consistently been reported (Slafer and Savin, 1994;Miralles and Slafer, 1995;Abbate et al, 1997;Cruz-Aguado et al, 1999;Calderini et al, 2006;Lázaro et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Mohammadi, 2012;Saeidi et al, 2012;Abdoli et al, 2013;Serrago et al, 2013;Trujillo-Negrellos et al, 2014;Cantarero et al, 2016). Accordingly, Borrás et al (2004) reappraised an extensive dataset comprising 18 studies published between 1975 and 1995 and examined the response of grain weight to the availability of assimilates during grain filling, finding that wheat grain yield was barely source-limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the study of the relationship between the source and the sink, it was observed that the removal of half of the spikelets caused a decrease in the number of grains in the spike, the weight of a single spike, and the weight of the whole grain of wheat (Wang et al, 2021). In the conditions of drought stress, the removal of wheat spikelets increased grain yield and 1000-grain weight by 35 and 21%, respectively (Abdoli et al, 2013). In maize, leaf removal resulted in significant remobilization of stem reserves, which did not completely alleviate seed weight loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%