1967
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(67)90107-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of some therapeutic agents on the rabbit fetus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McColl et al (1967) described an increased incidence of small auricles in the hearts from fetuses whose does had been administered 200 mg/kg a day of aspirin by gavage from GD 7 to GD 15. Schardein et al (1969) reported a marked reduction in litter size among does that received 200 mg/kg a day of aspirin from GD 6 to GD 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McColl et al (1967) described an increased incidence of small auricles in the hearts from fetuses whose does had been administered 200 mg/kg a day of aspirin by gavage from GD 7 to GD 15. Schardein et al (1969) reported a marked reduction in litter size among does that received 200 mg/kg a day of aspirin from GD 6 to GD 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005) were found to be different from those of the skeletal anomalies in fetuses from the PB‐administered dams reported in the rat studies by Terada et al . (1987) and McColl et al . (1963, 1967) and in the present study, as well as in the mouse studies by Walker and Patterson (1974) and Sullivan and McElhatton (1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Teratologic studies with laboratory animals demonstrated PB‐induced cleft palate in mice (Walker & Patterson 1974; Sullivan & McElhatton 1975), skeletal malformation in rats (McColl et al . 1963) and skull defects in rabbits (McColl 1967). The types of retinoic acid‐induced skeletal anomalies (Shoji et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous investigators speculated that it is the malformed or defective offspring that are cannibalized. Published studies in both mice (Kalter, 1970) and rabbits (McColl, Robinson & Globus, 1967) implied that mutilation of presumably abnormal offspring by the mother was responsible for differences in the frequency of malformation in those killed at term compared to those allowed to deliver. Although this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally, the assumption has become a determining influence in rodent reproduction work and sacrifice at term has come into routine use to avoid cannibalism which could influence the analysis of reproductive effects (FDA, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%