2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soil depth on inelastic seismic response of structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A shallow pad foundation of length 4 m and width 2 m is assumed. As per Adhikary et al [ 84 ] and Prendergast and Gavin [ 92 ], a stiffness of 1.72 × 10 6 N/m can be expected for loose sand, with 3.44 × 10 6 N/m for medium-dense sand. The calculated stiffness provided by the springs under each pier in the test structure lies between these two and is assumed to be the equivalent of a founding on loose-to-medium-dense uniform sand in a comparable full-scale bridge.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A shallow pad foundation of length 4 m and width 2 m is assumed. As per Adhikary et al [ 84 ] and Prendergast and Gavin [ 92 ], a stiffness of 1.72 × 10 6 N/m can be expected for loose sand, with 3.44 × 10 6 N/m for medium-dense sand. The calculated stiffness provided by the springs under each pier in the test structure lies between these two and is assumed to be the equivalent of a founding on loose-to-medium-dense uniform sand in a comparable full-scale bridge.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These rest on piers, each with an associated mass and stiffness, and consisting of a single DOF in the vertical direction. The vertical stiffness provided by a shallow pad foundation is modelled as a spring under each pier, values of which were obtained based on those of Adhikary et al [ 84 ] and adjusted as proposed by Micu et al [ 85 ]. The start and the end of the bridge rest on undeformable abutments (on the assumption that these are not in the water).…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these sites, it is usually recommended to conduct a site-specific response spectrum analysis using geotechnical data for the selected soil profiles (e.g., El-Emam et al 2015). Moreover, a large number of studies show the importance of soil depth in evaluation of site amplification (Hadjian 2002;Lee and Trifunac 2010;Kamatchi et al 2010;Hashash 2011;Zhao and Xu 2013;Adhikary et al 2014).…”
Section: Hazard Spectrum Estimation and Its Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the effects of varying vehicle velocities and masses on the resulting bridge accelerations, an average bridge acceleration is obtained at each point of the bridge from a statistical population of traversing vehicles (by converting the time-varying bridge response to a spatially-varying response along the structure). This approach is tested using a four-span numerical model of a bridge (Cantero et al, 2010;Gonz alez, 2010), where piers are considered as sprung masses (Fitzgerald et al, 2019a(Fitzgerald et al, , 2019b, and foundations are modelled using vertical springs and dashpots for foundation stiffness and damping, respectively (Adhikary et al, 2014;Buckley et al, 2018;Ju, 2013;Mylonakis et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%