2010
DOI: 10.3109/08958370903161224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of smoking parameters on the particle size distribution and predicted airway deposition of mainstream cigarette smoke

Abstract: It is known that puffing conditions such as puff volume, duration, and frequency vary substantially among individual smokers. This study investigates how these parameters affect the particle size distribution and concentration of fresh mainstream cigarette smoke (MCS) and how these changes affect the predicted deposition of MCS particles in a model human respiratory tract. Measurements of the particle size distribution made with an electrical low pressure impactor for a variety of puffing conditions are presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…trends observed in the current study for unadjusted data, as well as to puff-by-puff trends reported by most other published studies (Adam et al 2009;Kane et al 2010). Note that Adam et al (2009) and Kane et al (2010) used a 50X and a variable 500-1000X dilution factor, respectively, and that these values are considerably lower than the dilution values employed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…trends observed in the current study for unadjusted data, as well as to puff-by-puff trends reported by most other published studies (Adam et al 2009;Kane et al 2010). Note that Adam et al (2009) and Kane et al (2010) used a 50X and a variable 500-1000X dilution factor, respectively, and that these values are considerably lower than the dilution values employed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…They reported count median diameters (CMD) ranging from 180-nm to 280-nm electric mobility diameter and particle number concentrations ranging from 1.4 × 10 9 particles cm −3 to 1.5 × 10 10 particles cm −3 . Kane et al (2010) used a customdesigned smoke sampling system and a Dekati Ltd. (Tampere, Finland) electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI) to measure the PSD and number concentration of reference cigarettes. CMDs reported in their study were in the range of 140-to 240-nm aerodynamic diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puff volumes ranging from 31 to 86 cm 3 have been studied in literature (Kane et al, 2010;vanDijk et al, 2011;Sahu et al, 2013) for conventional cigarette smoke. As an average of such values, a 50 cm 3 puff volume was considered in this study.…”
Section: Dose Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models that predict individual deposition doses of air pollutants are commonly used to estimate doses in epidemiology and toxicology studies and in risk assessments. Such models typically use input data on pollutant physical characteristics, subject breathing patterns, biological characteristics, and exposure times (ICRP 1994;NCRP 1997;Kane et al 2010). Output data include inhaled pollutant total deposition, regional deposition in various portions of the respiratory tract, and sometimes pollutant clearance and internal translocation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%